On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 10:41:35 PM UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
I share the same skepticism about using GitHub Discussions.
But Discourse would be a direct replacement for AskBot; it is widely used
with the same user-facing, not developer-centric, role.
I checked Discourse Group yesterd
### Steps To Reproduce
1. I installed Sage-Math 10.3 for my Mac M2 from
[https://github.com/3-manifolds/Sage_macOS/releases/](https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/link)
2. I tried running a program containing QEPCAD. The link for the program:
[tmp_sage_ani_git_issue.txt](https://github.com/us
It really does not work this way.
On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 7:21:34 PM UTC-7 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response due to conference travel.
>
> Vote count:
>
> (A1) 5
> (A3) 1
> (B) 1ish
>
> As such, please remove this automatic labeling of PR sizes.
>
> We can have a proper
https://pypi.org/project/sage-numerical-backends-cplex/10.4rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/sage-numerical-backends-gurobi/10.4rc1/
Upgrade PR: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38319
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscrib
Karma and other gamification instruments are apparently available as a
plugin. https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-gamification/225916
On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 12:47:48 AM UTC-7 Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 10:41:35 PM UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>
> I share the s
On 2 July 2024 08:47:48 BST, "Sébastien Labbé" wrote:
>
>
>On Monday, July 1, 2024 at 10:41:35 PM UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>
>I share the same skepticism about using GitHub Discussions.
>But Discourse would be a direct replacement for AskBot; it is widely used
>with the same user-facing
I think this is a bug:
```
#Author Georgi Guninski
p=90887;Kp=GF(p);g=Kp(2);X=46712;a=X*g
print(a==X*g)
Y=discrete_log_lambda(a,g,operation="+",bounds=(1,p))
-> 1076 raise ValueError("Pollard Lambda failed to find a log")
ValueError: Pollard Lambda failed to find a log
```
--
You received this
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 3:35 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> Karma and other gamification instruments are apparently available as a
> plugin. https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-gamification/225916
This one doesn't seem to be available in our test installation.
It could be it's only available fo
Please try with a more recent version of Sage (yours is 10.0.beta2 per
config.log; we have updated gfortran since then) and in
particular https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38319, which updates the
sage-numerical-backends-... packages.
10.0.beta2
On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 7:36:44 AM UTC-7
On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 10:27:34 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 3:35 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> Karma and other gamification instruments are apparently available as a
plugin. https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-gamification/225916
This one doesn't seem to be
Given that on the input we discuss that answers returned by msolve don't make
sense,
we should leave it in place.
IMHO msolve tries to find a univariate representation for the solutions, and so
it needs a big field to work in - and I don't even know whether there any
pitfalls with this approac
That's an ... interesting ... way to do a division, but sure: also in prime
cyclic groups represented as an additive group discrete log algorithms
should work.
When I try your example on a version that is reported as 10.3.beta3, I'm
not getting an error, so you'll probably have to include versi
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:48 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 10:27:34 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 3:35 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> >
> > Karma and other gamification instruments are apparently available as a
> > plugin. https://meta.discours
13 matches
Mail list logo
