On Jan 18, 2012, at 12:56 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 1/17/12 5:33 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
> Of course any bug reports or suggestions are very welcome. In particular
> checking my initial examples would be helpful. Some screen shots are
> available athttp://boxen.math.washington.edu
OK, I've opened #12320 : make cephes installable on ARMs.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-deve
On Monday, 16 January 2012 22:48:01 UTC+8, Snark wrote:
>
> Le 16/01/2012 15:42, Burcin Erocal a �crit :
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST)
> > Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> >> Once again, let me bring up the numerical noise issue on ARM.
> >> The problem is that while we pretty much n
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:46:27AM -0800, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>graphs.maps.WorldMap(world = "US")
>Ahem. No, rather
>graphs.maps.WorldMap()
>graphs.maps.USMap()
Or just, from the user perspective:
graphs.WorldMap("World countries")
graphs.WorldMap("USA states")
> Or just, from the user perspective:
Hmmm By the way we really should have some generic search engine
for such things O_o
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
On 2012-01-18 11:22, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:46:27AM -0800, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>>graphs.maps.WorldMap(world = "US")
>>Ahem. No, rather
>>graphs.maps.WorldMap()
>>graphs.maps.USMap()
>
> Or just, from the user perspective:
>
> graphs.WorldMap(
Le 18/01/2012 11:36, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
On 2012-01-18 11:22, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:46:27AM -0800, Nathann Cohen wrote:
graphs.maps.WorldMap(world = "US")
Ahem. No, rather
graphs.maps.WorldMap()
graphs.maps.USMap()
Or just, from the user pers
>
> No strings please. Use something which is TAB-completion-friendly.
>
HMmm... In this case it would make sense, but for #11880 the database is
really huge O_o
I'd like to find a smooth trick for that one :-/
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Le 18/01/2012 12:35, Nathann Cohen a écrit :
No strings please. Use something which is TAB-completion-friendly.
HMmm... In this case it would make sense, but for #11880 the database is
really huge O_o
I'd like to find a smooth trick for that one :-/
What about a tree instead of a whole l
Hi Robert,
Hooray!
On 18 Jan., 00:20, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> Both, but primarily the latter. It's a microbenchmark, but loop like
>
> a = Integer(10)
> b = QQ(20)
> s = RDF(30)
> for x in range(10**n):
> s += a*b*x
>
> should give us an upper bound on how expensive any changes could be.
I
On 17 January 2012 14:03, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I have edited the supported platforms page to reflect the following, see
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/SupportedPlatforms
>
>
> * Sage on Solaris SPARC moved to untested. In practice it's actually
> broken on the Skynet machine "mark". I have perso
On 17/01/2012 10:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
(2) The copyright rule for papers is: "Each contribution must be
accompanied by a Springer copyright form, a so-called 'Consent to
Publish' form. Modified forms are not acceptable. Authors will be
asked to transfer the copyright of the paper to the
> > Of course any bug reports or suggestions are very welcome. In
> > particular checking my initial examples would be helpful. Some screen
> > shots are available athttp://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/
>
> Nice!
>
> As a question from someone who does not own a
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 at 10:19AM -0800, Volker Braun wrote:
> I consider it a bug that Python's testsuite fails on many systems even
> though the resulting python install is perfectly usable for our purposes.
> The Python spkg-check should be changed to not call the whole python
> testsuite blindl
In EGI grid ( egi.eu ) there are lots of x86_64 cores available under
ScientifiLinux (RedHat) v.4 - v.6
Is it an option to utilize this infrastructure for build tasks?
#Serge
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On Jan 18, 2:17 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 at 10:19AM -0800, Volker Braun wrote:
> > I consider it a bug that Python's testsuite fails on many systems even
> > though the resulting python install is perfectly usable for our purposes.
> > The Python spkg-check should be changed to
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 at 11:17PM +0900, Dan Drake wrote:
> Fortunately, upon digging in the makefile, I see that it's easy to avoid
> the few tests that we know won't work: in spkg-check, just change
>
> make test
>
> to
>
> make EXTRATESTOPTS="-x test_tcl -x test_dbm -x test_gdbm -x test_bsddb" t
By the way, the "small" regression in my timings you posted above is
actually non-existent.
Those are the first one I ran (and posted on #715).
Afterward, I ran other "make ptestlong" and the the variance was big
enough for the above difference to be meaningless.
I mean I sometimes got more than th
On Jan 18, 2012, at 3:07 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>> Of course any bug reports or suggestions are very welcome. In
>>> particular checking my initial examples would be helpful. Some screen
>>> shots are available athttp://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/
>>
>> Nice!
>>
>>>
Is there an existing way to doctest for performance regressions? I have
in mind:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12292
If I create a big enough matrix, I can make charpoly() take, say, N
seconds. The second call should take around 0 seconds. I would like to
test that 0http://groups.go
On Jan 18, 2012 5:05 AM, "Jacques Carette"
wrote:
>
> On 17/01/2012 10:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> (2) The copyright rule for papers is: "Each contribution must be
>> accompanied by a Springer copyright form, a so-called 'Consent to
>> Publish' form. Modified forms are not acceptable. Auth
> > Or is something else what happens?
>
> > +++
>
> > The reason I ask is that I had multiple requests about the single-cell
> > at the Joint Meetings table, and in particular this issue of
> > persistence came up for one gentleman (Jason, I think you spoke with
> > him too). I strongly suspect
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:37:00PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 05:37 PM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> >
> >Unfortunately, that's not the problem. As I already said, I tried from 6
> >different computers using windows and linux OSes, Firefox, IE, Opera,
> >Konqueror as browser... All s
Hi,
On sage-4.7.2, the third line of the following shows two cubes + one
sphere in jmol :
sage: a = cube((1,0,0), color='red') + cube((0,0,3), color='green')
sage: b = a + sphere((0,0,0), color='yellow')
sage: a
I was expecting only two cubes, but the addition changed a. Is this a
normal behavio
The command "set -e" in a bash script makes it such that any error quits
the shell.
So if you do:
set -e
cd mydir
rm -rf *
and "mydir" doesn't exist, the script will stop after "cd mydir".
I seem to remember an opinion within Sage that using "set -e" is bad but
never heard an argument for this.
The Feb. 2012 Notices of the American Mathematical Society have two
articles which, while not directly about Sage, are certainly of
interest.
Publishing Computational Mathematics, by Tim Daly (of Axiom, a
frequent contributor on sage-devel)
http://www.ams.org/notices/201202/rtx120200320p.pdf
Math
The only reason against set -e is if you want to capture the error and then
print a human-readable error message. But all command sequences that don't
check the status should be in set -e brackets.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this g
On Jan 18, 2:42 pm, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On sage-4.7.2, the third line of the following shows two cubes + one
> sphere in jmol :
>
> sage: a = cube((1,0,0), color='red') + cube((0,0,3), color='green')
> sage: b = a + sphere((0,0,0), color='yellow')
> sage: a
>
> I was expecting only
On 1/18/12 8:07 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Of course any bug reports or suggestions are very welcome. In particular
checking my initial examples would be helpful. Some screen shots are available
athttp://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/
Nice!
As a question from someone who does not ow
On 1/18/12 1:42 PM, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
Hi,
On sage-4.7.2, the third line of the following shows two cubes + one
sphere in jmol :
sage: a = cube((1,0,0), color='red') + cube((0,0,3), color='green')
sage: b = a + sphere((0,0,0), color='yellow')
sage: a
I was expecting only two cubes, but the
> The single-cell server (right now) doesn't delete the input and output
> for the session (even though the actual running sage session which
> produced the output is long gone).
I see! Thanks, that clarifies the distinction between what is saved
and what is not. Sorry for the lack of comprehe
In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
William hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get it do do
anything but throw HTTP-500 internal server errors. Since I am once again
at an institution that blocks ports != 80 on wifi it would be helpful if
ther
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80, William
> hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get it do do anything
> but throw HTTP-500 internal server errors. Since I am once again at an
> institution t
On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
William hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get it do
do anything but throw HTTP-500 internal server errors. Since I am once
again at an institution that blocks ports !=
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
>> William hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get it do
>> do anything but throw HTTP-500 internal server erro
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:26:33 -0800 (PST)
kcrisman wrote:
> Publishing Computational Mathematics, by Tim Daly (of Axiom, a
> frequent contributor on sage-devel)
> http://www.ams.org/notices/201202/rtx120200320p.pdf
Literate programming is not just adding comments to code, but here are
a few numb
Thanks, works!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
On 1/18/12 4:45 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:26:33 -0800 (PST)
kcrisman wrote:
Publishing Computational Mathematics, by Tim Daly (of Axiom, a
frequent contributor on sage-devel)
http://www.ams.org/notices/201202/rtx120200320p.pdf
Literate programming is not just adding com
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>>
>>> In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
>>> William hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
Willia
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
>>> wrote:
On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> In the recent thr
They seem about equally fast to me, both around a count of 1. Connecting
from Singapore.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googl
On 1/18/12 8:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
FYI, just converted all my WebWork problems that call the single-cell
and all is well. Response times appear to be very good except for an
occasional hiccup (which could be anything.)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an e
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/18/12 8:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus
>>> wrote:
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On W
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 at 02:05PM -0800, Volker Braun wrote:
> Since I am once again at an institution that blocks ports != 80 on
> wifi it would be helpful if there were a way to connect to the single
> cell server.
Do they block port 22? If not, I'd use an ssh tunnel. Otherwise, I would
use tor, wh
On 1/18/12 9:55 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
On 1/18/12 8:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, William Steinwrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus
wrote:
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 at 06:42PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> I just did a little test of http://aleph.sagemath.org. I made this
> interact in aleph and also in sagenb.org:
>
> @interact
> def f(n=(1..10)):
> print n*n
>
>
> With aleph, I can easily count to 4 from when I let go of the slide
My Java client for the single cell server that is at the core of the
Android app pretty consistently gets a reply in about 1s. And I have ping
times of about 150ms. Here is the log for a sample session for "1+1":
<< (32ms) Request to execute
>> (871ms) Python output
SageOutput
{
"content":{
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> My Java client for the single cell server that is at the core of the Android
> app pretty consistently gets a reply in about 1s. And I have ping times of
> about 150ms. Here is the log for a sample session for "1+1":
Very interesting! So the
On 1/18/12 10:54 PM, William Stein wrote:
So I'm reporting a bug
which is that interacts are slow.
Tracked here:
https://github.com/jasongrout/simple-python-db-compute/issues/227
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
I don't see anything special with interacts in the Java client. It takes a
little bit over 1s to get the interact prepare, and getting the update
after changing the value (here to n=7) again takes about 1s. But when I use
the web interface the interacts feel slower (I'd say about 3s to update
a
In general we would like to avoid writing doctests that are large only
to take a measurable amount of time, but you could look into using
cputime() with the first invocation and then making sure the second
call is < 0.0x * (first call time).
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote
53 matches
Mail list logo
