> >
> > sudo apt-get maxima
>
It should be
sudo apt-get install maxima
and as Mike pointed out, that requires admin access. A *.deb file like what
you found is an installer for Debian based systems (such as Ubuntu), also
requiring admin access.
You could always create a Sage notebook account (s
I've tried twice to build Sage on a machine in which 'flex' was not in the path.
It has both times failed with:
make install in Singular
make[4]: Entering directory
`/export/home/drkirkby/32/sage-4.4.3/spkg/build/singular-3-1-0-4-20100214/src/Singular'
sh flexer.sh -I -Pyylp -t libparse.l >lib
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> So is flex a requirement to build Sage? If it is, then I'll add to the
> 'prereq' script a test for flex. If, which I doubt, it is only needed on
> Solaris, then I'll make the test specific to Solaris.
For what it's worth, Sage / Singular
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Jason B Hill wrote:
>
>> >
>> > sudo apt-get maxima
>
> It should be
>
> sudo apt-get install maxima
>
> and as Mike pointed out, that requires admin access. A *.deb file like what
> you found is an installer for Debian based systems (such as Ubuntu), also
> requir
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I've tried twice to build Sage on a machine in which 'flex' was not in the
> path. It has both times failed with:
>
> make install in Singular
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/export/home/drkirkby/32/sage-4.4.3/spkg/build/singular-3-1-0-4-
>
> there will be no new accounts on sagenb.org :-(
>
so i was lucky enough to create an account few days back? voila!
apparently sagenb doesn't have any link to offer new account creation
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, sen
On 06/ 6/10 09:45 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
I've tried twice to build Sage on a machine in which 'flex' was not in the
path. It has both times failed with:
make install in Singular
make[4]: Entering directory
`/export/home/drkirkby/32/sag
On 06/ 6/10 09:18 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
So is flex a requirement to build Sage? If it is, then I'll add to the
'prereq' script a test for flex. If, which I doubt, it is only needed on
Solaris, then I'll make the test specific to Solaris.
> > You could also try
> >
> >
> >sage -ba
> >
> >
> > which will rebuild from scratch all Cython code.
>
> OK I will give it a go.
No improvement. I am considering this upgrade officially failed
on my machine.
Francois
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.c
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I've tried twice to build Sage on a machine in which 'flex' was not in
> the path. It has both times failed with:
>
> make install in Singular
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/export/home/drkirkby/32/sage-4.4.3/spkg/build/singu
On 06/ 6/10 10:53 AM, François Bissey wrote:
You could also try
sage -ba
which will rebuild from scratch all Cython code.
OK I will give it a go.
No improvement. I am considering this upgrade officially failed
on my machine.
Francois
Can anyone tell me what happens in a 'sage -up
> On 06/ 6/10 10:53 AM, François Bissey wrote:
> >>> You could also try
> >>>
> >>> sage -ba
> >>>
> >>> which will rebuild from scratch all Cython code.
> >>
> >> OK I will give it a go.
> >
> > No improvement. I am considering this upgrade officially failed
> > on my machine.
> >
> > Fra
On 06/ 6/10 11:27 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I've tried twice to build Sage on a machine in which 'flex' was not in
the path. It has both times failed with:
make install in Singular
make[4]: Entering directory
`/export/home
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:51:43AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 06/ 6/10 11:27 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
>> The way this usually works is that packages are shipped with the output of
>> flex, so that flex doesn't have to be run again if the user doesn't have it.
>>
>> In this case tha
Hi
When I untar sage as root not all files are owned
as root. (This is after running make as root, but still)
0 r...@muizenberg:/usr/local/src/sage-4.4.3#ls -ln
total 30672
-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 100071842 2010-06-06 07:43 COPYING.txt
drwxr-xr-x 800 4096 2010-06-06 09:26 data
drwxr-x
Hi
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:11:47PM +0200, j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
> I used to do chmod a+R /usr/local/src/sage*
correction chmod a+r -R
Jan
--
.~.
/V\ Jan Groenewald
/( )\www.aims.ac.za
^^-^^
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To uns
On 06/ 6/10 12:11 PM, j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi
When I untar sage as root not all files are owned
as root. (This is after running make as root, but still)
It's unwise to use the root account for anything where it is not needed. The
chance of you accidentally screwing up your system is much hi
HI
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 12:29:37PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 06/ 6/10 12:11 PM, j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> When I untar sage as root not all files are owned
>> as root. (This is after running make as root, but still)
>
> It's unwise to use the root account for anything where i
What I do is this:
(1) unpack and build in my own directory
(2) using sudo, copy everything to /usr/local/sage/sage-x.y.z
(3) using sudo, run /usr/local/sage/sage-x.y.z/sage once
(4) using sudo, do chown -R root:root /usr/local/sage/ and also chmod
-R a+rX /usr/local/sage
Note the capital X in th
Hi
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> >> When I untar sage as root not all files are owned
> >> as root. (This is after running make as root, but still)
> My query is about the file ownerships and still stands please.
Let me expand.
Unlike other packages, sage does
Hi
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 12:47:01PM +0100, John Cremona wrote:
> What I do is this:
>
> (1) unpack and build in my own directory
> (2) using sudo, copy everything to /usr/local/sage/sage-x.y.z
> (3) using sudo, run /usr/local/sage/sage-x.y.z/sage once
> (4) using sudo, do chown -R root:root /us
Hi Jason,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> Wow, that ticket is closed as fixed, only an 1.5 hours after you submitted
> it!
Yes, that was quick. And Sage 4.4.3 builds at least on these machines
on the GCC Compile Farm:
* gcc11: Debian GNU/Linux 5.0, Dual-Core AMD Opteron
I've build Sage 4.4.3 on a Sun Blade 1000 but when running the long doctests,
the output appears to hang. But the actual doctest command is not shown properly.
First the output of 'make ptestlong' showed this:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/lseries.py
[10.2 s]
sage -t -
On 06/ 6/10 11:59 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:51:43AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 06/ 6/10 11:27 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
The way this usually works is that packages are shipped with the output of
flex, so that flex doesn't have to be run again if t
On 06/ 6/10 09:18 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
So is flex a requirement to build Sage? If it is, then I'll add to the
'prereq' script a test for flex. If, which I doubt, it is only needed on
Solaris, then I'll make the test specific to Solaris.
On 6 Jun., 15:31, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> I've build Sage 4.4.3 on a Sun Blade 1000 but when running the long doctests,
> the output appears to hang. But the actual doctest command is not shown
> properly.
>
> First the output of 'make ptestlong' showed this:
>
> sage -t -long devel/sage/sag
Hi all,
Version 0.15 of mpmath is now available on the website:
http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
It can also be downloaded from the Python Package Index:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpmath/0.15
Mpmath is a pure-Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point
arithmetic that implements an e
On 6 Jun., 12:27, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> > I've tried twice to build Sage on a machine in which 'flex' was not in
> > the path. It has both times failed with:
>
> > make install in Singular
> > make[4]: Entering directory
On 06/ 6/10 04:43 PM, leif wrote:
On 6 Jun., 12:27, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
The way this usually works is that packages are shipped with the output of
flex, so that flex doesn't have to be run again if the user doesn't have it.
This is a more general problem ([f]lex and yacc/bison are ju
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Version 0.15 of mpmath is now available on the website:
> http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
>
> It can also be downloaded from the Python Package Index:
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpmath/0.15
>
> Mpmath is a pure-Python libra
On 6 Jun., 19:02, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> On 06/ 6/10 04:43 PM, leif wrote:
> > [1]http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/disseminating_code.html#dissemi...
> > [2]http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/producing_spkgs.html#producing-...
> > [3]http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/patching_spkg
On 06/ 6/10 07:29 PM, leif wrote:
On 6 Jun., 19:02, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
Could I twist your arm to review the changes?
Be a little patient, awaiting 4.4.4.alpha0...
(And in principle the patch should be tested on other Solaris systems,
too... I currently can only give it a "Linux-ok" -
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 06/ 6/10 07:29 PM, leif wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Jun., 19:02, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>
>>> Could I twist your arm to review the changes?
>>
>> Be a little patient, awaiting 4.4.4.alpha0...
>> (And in principle the patch should be tested on
> I've tested on multiple Solaris systems, both with and without 'flex' in
> the path - see trac ticket for further details.
>
> The more I look at the Singular package in Sage, the more I realise it is
> a complete mess. There are 5 copies of install-sh for example. Sage's
> spkg-install has op
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:48 PM, François Bissey wrote:
>> I've tested on multiple Solaris systems, both with and without 'flex' in
>> the path - see trac ticket for further details.
>>
>> The more I look at the Singular package in Sage, the more I realise it is
>> a complete mess. There are 5 co
On 06/ 6/10 11:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
In case anybody from Singular is reading this -- the above is the
opinion of David and not the Sage project as a whole. I'll add that,
in my experience, Singular is fairly easy to build and portable, more
so than many other programs. When I've person
On 06/ 6/10 11:48 PM, François Bissey wrote:
yes singular is a downright mess, upstream and in sage.
I'm glad I'm not alone in my view.
Apart from moving to the latest upstream I think the singular spkg
is due for a spring clean. It build an enormous amount of targets
in a way that looks lik
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 06/ 6/10 11:48 PM, François Bissey wrote:
>
>> yes singular is a downright mess, upstream and in sage.
>
> I'm glad I'm not alone in my view.
I just want to clarify something again (which David already
clarified): you guys are both talk
I'm sure Singular has a process to fix the problems you mention.
All you have to do is send a 'diff -Naur' patch that improves the build.
You got hundreds of megabytes of code for free and you're complaining
because the install script isn't written the way you advocate?
Advocacy is volunteering.
On 7 Jun., 01:19, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>
> wrote:
> > On 06/ 6/10 11:48 PM, François Bissey wrote:
>
> >> yes singular is a downright mess, upstream and in sage.
>
> > I'm glad I'm not alone in my view.
>
> I just want to clarify something again
On 7 Jun., 01:29, Tim Daly wrote:
> I'm sure Singular has a process to fix the problems you mention.
> All you have to do is send a 'diff -Naur' patch that improves the build.
Of course. But the current workaround just happens in spkg-install.
> You got hundreds of megabytes of code for free and
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:35 PM, leif wrote:
> On 7 Jun., 01:19, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On 06/ 6/10 11:48 PM, François Bissey wrote:
>>
>> >> yes singular is a downright mess, upstream and in sage.
>>
>> > I'm glad I'm not alone
> I'm sure Singular has a process to fix the problems you mention.
> All you have to do is send a 'diff -Naur' patch that improves the build.
>
> You got hundreds of megabytes of code for free and you're complaining
> because the install script isn't written the way you advocate?
>
> Advocacy is
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:06 PM, François Bissey wrote:
>> I'm sure Singular has a process to fix the problems you mention.
>> All you have to do is send a 'diff -Naur' patch that improves the build.
>>
>> You got hundreds of megabytes of code for free and you're complaining
>> because the install
On 7 Jun., 02:02, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:35 PM, leif wrote:
> > I thought in this thread we were only talking about its build system,
> > not the source code or Singular's quality in general.
>
> > I cannot resist to give some excerpts from just src/Singular/
> > Makefile
I want to respond to this message with:
Try this in Sage by simply typing
sage: install_package('nzmath')
sage: import nzmath
sage: help(nzmath)
sage: import nzmath.matrix
sage: preparser(False)
sage: nzmath.matrix.Matrix(2,3)
/mnt/usb1/scratch/wstein/build/sage-4.4.3.rc0/local/lib/python2.6/site
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:53:26 -0700, William Stein wrote:
> I want to respond to this message with:
>
> Try this in Sage by simply typing
>
> sage: install_package('nzmath')
> sage: import nzmath
> sage: help(nzmath)
> sage: import nzmath.matrix
> sage: preparser(False)
> sage: nzmath.matrix.Matri
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> I tried the spkg, and it appears to work fine. I noticed that hg status
> was complaining about the files in src/, so I made a simple .hgignore to
> get rid of that. I also added some more information to SPKG.txt. The
> updated spkg is linked
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:03 AM, NAKAMULA, Ken
wrote:
> Dear number theorists,
>
> We are pleased to announce the release of NZMATH 1.0.
>
> NZMATH is a Python based system for number theory developed for six
> years. Various modules useful for number theory are included in
> NZMATH package. This
49 matches
Mail list logo
