On Wed, 26 May 2010 20:45:36 -0700
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
> > Is anyone opposed to removing the deprecated functionality that
> > allows a person to do:
> >
> > sage: var('x,y')
> > (x, y)
> > sage: a=x^2+y
> > sage: a(1,2)
> > /Users/grout/s
On May 27, 2:27 am, kcrisman wrote:
> But quite different here - there are no email reminders, no anything.
We have an RSS feed and release announcements are emailed to over 1400
people!
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-announce/about
h
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@
Hi,
On Wed, 26 May 2010 20:37:04 -0400
Tim Lahey wrote:
> I seem to recall someone was working on a patch that
> allowed one to display (and presumably work with) partial
> derivatives in the traditional form. Does anybody know
> what happened to that?
There are two trac tickets related to this
On May 26, 8:34 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:31 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> >> > Not without having someone over your shoulder, which is why I still
> >> > don't/can't use them. (Maybe Rob and Jason will finally teach me when
> >> > they visit in June!).
>
> >> Sure. For a
On May 27, 4:12 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 20:45:36 -0700
>
>
>
>
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Jason Grout
> > wrote:
> > > Is anyone opposed to removing the deprecated functionality that
> > > allows a person to do:
>
> > > sage: var('x,y')
On May 27, 5:39 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On May 27, 2:27 am, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > But quite different here - there are no email reminders, no anything.
>
> We have an RSS feed and release announcements are emailed to over 1400
> people!http://groups.google.com/group/sage-announce/about
>
R
On a x86-Linux-pentium4 machine with 512M of memory,
I get sage-4.4.2 test failures that say
*** not enough memory
I have an x86-Linux-pentium4 machine with 1G of
memory (Skynet/cicero), and that machine is able to run the
test suite without running out of memory.
Is it expected that 1G of me
On 27 Mai, 02:34, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:31 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> >> > Not without having someone over your shoulder, which is why I still
> >> > don't/can't use them. (Maybe Rob and Jason will finally teach me when
> >> > they visit in June!).
> Go for it! I wrote h
Hello,
Looking at the output of "sage -advanced", I couldn't see an explanation
of "-docbuild". Unfortunately, I cannot provide a better patch than the
one below. In fact, to me it's a bit unclear what I can actually put as
"lang" and .
If there were some more explanation of every option, I'd hig
On May 27, 10:32 am, leif wrote:
> On 27 Mai, 02:34, William Stein wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:31 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > >> > Not without having someone over your shoulder, which is why I still
> > >> > don't/can't use them. (Maybe Rob and Jason will finally teach me when
> > >>
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looking at the output of "sage -advanced", I couldn't see an explanation
> of "-docbuild". Unfortunately, I cannot provide a better patch than the
> one below.
The output of "sage -help" shows docbuild:
[mv...@sage ~]$
Hi Mariah,
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Mariah wrote:
> On a x86-Linux-pentium4 machine with 512M of memory,
> I get sage-4.4.2 test failures that say
>
> *** not enough memory
>
> I have an x86-Linux-pentium4 machine with 1G of
> memory (Skynet/cicero), and that machine is able to run the
On May 27, 11:27 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Mariah,
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Mariah wrote:
> > On a x86-Linux-pentium4 machine with 512M of memory,
> > I get sage-4.4.2 test failures that say
>
> > *** not enough memory
>
> > I have an x86-Linux-pentium4 machine with 1G of
> > m
Thanks Minh,
for your suggestions. In fact, I wouldn't have expected that simply
typing "sage -docbuild" gives a nice help.
In fact, sage is not quite consistent here. "sage -b" does actually do
something. Would be nice if there were a system so that, for example,
"sage -h -some-option" would giv
On 27 Mai, 16:30, kcrisman wrote:
> On May 27, 5:39 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> > On May 27, 2:27 am, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > > But quite different here - there are no email reminders, no anything.
>
> > We have an RSS feed and release announcements are emailed to over 1400
> > people!http://gro
On 27 Mai, 16:59, kcrisman wrote:
> On May 27, 10:32 am, leif wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 27 Mai, 02:34, William Stein wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:31 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > > >> > Not without having someone over your shoulder, which is why I still
> > > >> > don't/can't use them. (Mayb
On 27 Mai, 17:43, kcrisman wrote:
> On May 27, 11:27 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Hi Mariah,
>
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Mariah wrote:
> > > On a x86-Linux-pentium4 machine with 512M of memory,
> > > I get sage-4.4.2 test failures that say
>
> > > *** not enough memory
>
No swap p
On 27 Mai, 17:43, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Thanks Minh,
>
> for your suggestions. In fact, I wouldn't have expected that simply
> typing "sage -docbuild" gives a nice help.
The =all option should be at top level.
Also, "fr/all" (or "en/all") doesn't work.
> In fact, sage is not quite consistent he
BTW, is there some reason why the -advanced output doesn't use an
80 character line length. It's really hard to read if the lines
wrap.
>
> Even dumb (serial) terminals have 132 column mode ;-)
> And screens tend to get bigger and wider, so I consider 80 cols a bit
> obsolete.
I do
On 27 Mai, 19:31, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> BTW, is there some reason why the -advanced output doesn't use an
> 80 character line length. It's really hard to read if the lines
> wrap.
>
> > Even dumb (serial) terminals have 132 column mode ;-)
> > And screens tend to get bigger and wid
On May 27, 8:43 am, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Thanks Minh,
>
> for your suggestions. In fact, I wouldn't have expected that simply
> typing "sage -docbuild" gives a nice help.
>
> In fact, sage is not quite consistent here. "sage -b" does actually do
> something. Would be nice if there were a system
Hi all,
I've got an extern project, namely, which is not currently part of the
Sage tree. Now, I want to start using doctests and I wonder how to do
it. Sage reports a mysterious error.
sage -t "jacobiforms/jacobiformd1nn_fegenerators.py" # Segfault
The point is, this even happens if I remov
Hi John,
> See trac ticket #21.
Your help looks great. Why isn't it the sage default?
What's the procedure to get it into a new release?
Ralf
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googleg
Hi Volker,
I put a new version of toric lattices patch. Now it should work nicely
with plain vectors and matrices, in particular homomorphisms seem to
do what they should (there is a simple example in the end of "module
level" documentation). I don't think anymore that there is any need
for a sepa
Hello,
It seems that Sage doesn't yet have tools to render nice pictures of
hyperbolic geometry. I would like to be able to plot fundamental
domains and tessellations for some Fuchsian groups (in the three
standard conformal models: half-plane, disc and hyperboloid). Has
anybody started some work
On 5/27/10 10:35 PM, Vincent D wrote:
More generally, the way sage.plot is built seems to be dedicated
mostly to function graphs. Is it possible to attach geometric objects
to an underlying space? meaning that if I have a Square attached to
the euclidean plane, I would like to be able to act on
On 5/27/10 11:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/27/10 10:35 PM, Vincent D wrote:
More generally, the way sage.plot is built seems to be dedicated
mostly to function graphs. Is it possible to attach geometric objects
to an underlying space? meaning that if I have a Square attached to
the euclidean
27 matches
Mail list logo
