[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Stan Schymanski
Hi John, I installed "It's all text" a while ago, but I have not found a way of linking it to a WYSIWYG editor. TinyMCE is an office-like WYSIWYG editor, so it seems totally different to "It's all text". Just go to their web page and try it out: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/examples/full.php#

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Michael Brickenstein
I made good experiences with TinyMCE in two projects. So a +1 Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread John Cremona
I certainly have no objections -- I had not appreciated the WYSYWIG aspect, since I hardly use such things. John 2008/10/14 Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi John, > > I installed "It's all text" a while ago, but I have not found a way of > linking it to a WYSIWYG editor. TinyMCE is an

[sage-devel] Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Jason Grout
Recently I've been working on WYSIWYG editing for the text cells of Sage. I've made an spkg for the TinyMCE javascript editor. The idea is that you can double-click on any text cell and, in-place, a TinyMCE editor pops up that lets you edit HTML code in a familiar word-processor sort of envi

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Stan Schymanski
Hi Martin, I think that most of the developers would agree with you, but bear in mind that a large number of potential users come from the WYSIWYG icon clicking world. These are often the same people that get discouraged by the need of having to install optional packages, so I wonder if there

[sage-devel] Re: Sage public notebook servers

2008-10-14 Thread Robert Miller
> A security researcher decided to purposely take down sage.math to > demonstrate that it is possible to fork bomb the machine through the > public sage notebook servers.   I had always plan to run these comletley > public servers until something like this happened.  Therefore, > sagenb.org (and t

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage public notebook servers

2008-10-14 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Serge Salamanka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have experience with Xen. > Can set up a virtual machine for Sage. > It's not that difficult anyway. What do you need to do this? How secure are they? By the way, I'm currently copied all the data from sagenb.org

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:06 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for inclusion. I think this is worth it, for the reasons given > below by Jason. It is almost orthogonal in use to the "Its all text" > plugin, which works great for me on WIndows but irritates me on macs > for some reas

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > William Stein wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:06 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> +1 for inclusion. I think this is worth it, for the reasons given >>> below by Jason. It is almost orthogonal in use to the

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Jason Grout
Stan Schymanski wrote: > William Stein wrote: >> Does tinyMCE have any sort of equation plugin? Have you thought >> about that at all? >> >> > Could we put the html code provided by tinyMCE into an input cell and > preparse > > %hide > %html > > or > > %hideall > %html > > Then, we could

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath.org website update #5

2008-10-14 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Oct 12, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hello all, here is a short update about the sagemath.org website. > > First, when i started to monitor the access, the usual number of > visits per day was 800-1000. It still varies, but you can think of > 2000 visits per day now. Mainly due

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Jason Grout
William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:06 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +1 for inclusion. I think this is worth it, for the reasons given >> below by Jason. It is almost orthogonal in use to the "Its all text" >> plugin, which works great for me on WIndows but irritates me

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Jason Grout
Peter wrote: > There is a WYSIWYG equation plugin for TinyMCE that has a demo page at > http://www.imathas.com/editordemo/demo.html . > > On Firefox it uses MathML, and on other browsers it uses a graphics > images fallback approach. Oh, wow, that looks interesting. It looks like it would be fa

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Peter
There is a WYSIWYG equation plugin for TinyMCE that has a demo page at http://www.imathas.com/editordemo/demo.html . On Firefox it uses MathML, and on other browsers it uses a graphics images fallback approach. --Peter On Oct 14, 7:38 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct

[sage-devel] Problems with is_irreducible function

2008-10-14 Thread Peter Schwabe
Hi, I just encountered a problem with the is_irreducible function. The following code does not work as exptected: p = 82434016654300679721217353503190038836571781811386228921167322412819029493183 F = GF(p) Fu. = F[] Fext2. = GF(p**2, name='X', modulus=u**2 + 2) xi = X + 1 Fext2v. = Fext2[] Fext

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath.org website update #5

2008-10-14 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > >> >> Hello all, here is a short update about the sagemath.org website. >> >> First, when i started to monitor the access, the usual number of >> visits per day was

[sage-devel] Problem with multi-extension fields

2008-10-14 Thread Peter Schwabe
Hi, the following code doesn't finish computation: p = 82434016654300679721217353503190038836571781811386228921167322412819029493183 F = GF(p) Fu. = F[] Fext2. = GF(p**2, name='X', modulus=u**2 + 2) xi = X + 1 xibar = 1 - X Fext2v. = Fext2[] Fext6. = GF(p**6, name='Y', modulus=v**3 - xi)

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Jason Grout
Peter wrote: > There is a WYSIWYG equation plugin for TinyMCE that has a demo page at > http://www.imathas.com/editordemo/demo.html . > > On Firefox it uses MathML, and on other browsers it uses a graphics > images fallback approach. The javascript svg editor plugin there also looks very intere

[sage-devel] More pictures from Sage Days 10

2008-10-14 Thread Jaap Spies
See http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/j.spies88/SageDays10AtNancy?authkey=S6KBCzf-v34# for some pictures of SD10. Cheers, Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMA

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath.org website update #5

2008-10-14 Thread Harald Schilly
On Oct 14, 4:41 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, are you still keeping download stats? > no, the point is, to get viable download stats you have to look at the webserver stats, see williams posting. I want to implement some tracking across all mirrors for

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.rc0 released

2008-10-14 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 13, 4:28 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had two timeout failures on my G4 mac (os 10.4), and one "real" > failure: > > sage -t  devel/sage/sage/rings/real_lazy.pyx > ** > File "/Users/mh/Desktop/sage-3.1.3.rc

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.rc0 released

2008-10-14 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, the final 3.1.3 is imminent - the only fix besides one doctest patch and the mandatory "make the documentation build patch" is the lazy_rings numerical noise doctest failure. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread David Joyner
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, do you vote > > [X ] Yes, include TinyMCE as a standard package > [ ] Yes, include TinyMCE as an optional package > [ ] No, do not include TinyMCE as a package > Also, if this is added I hope that somewhere the t

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Jason Grout
mabshoff wrote: > > > > [X ] Yes, include TinyMCE as a standard package > > I see no benefit going the optional route if one needs to apply some > patch, i.e. the burden to try it out is too high. The editor is well > maintained, works on seemingly all browsers, has an active community > and

[sage-devel] Heaviside step and impulse functions

2008-10-14 Thread Ronan Paixão
So, I have seen someone talk about those some time ago, but how is their implementation going? Both the step function u(x) and the impulse function delta(x) are pretty useful in Engineering, specially when talking about Laplace and Fourier transforms, so that could help a lot those who use Sage f

[sage-devel] Re: Heaviside step and impulse functions

2008-10-14 Thread David Joyner
What is wrong with using the piecewise defined functions for the unit step function? You are right though, delta functions are not implemented yet. Of course, they are not really functions either, so how they should be implemented is an issue as well. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Ronan Paix

[sage-devel] Re: Final Sage 3.1.3 sources are out

2008-10-14 Thread David Joyner
My copy of 31.3.rc0 got hosed somehow using sage -upgrade. I have no idea what I did wrong. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3: > > #4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.p

[sage-devel] Re: Final Sage 3.1.3 sources are out

2008-10-14 Thread David Joyner
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3: > > #4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.py to > 100%, and fix typos [Reviewed by John Cremona] > #4272: Michael Abshoff: add the files

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Tuesday 14 October 2008, Jason Grout wrote: > So, do you vote > > [ ] Yes, include TinyMCE as a standard package > [ ] Yes, include TinyMCE as an optional package > [ ] No, do not include TinyMCE as a package I don't want to vote against it just know but I don't really get the need for a WYSI

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Stan Schymanski
William Stein wrote: > Does tinyMCE have any sort of equation plugin? Have you thought > about that at all? > > Could we put the html code provided by tinyMCE into an input cell and preparse %hide %html or %hideall %html Then, we could just write e.g. $E=m*c^2$ in the tinyMCE editor and i

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread mhampton
+1 for inclusion. I think this is worth it, for the reasons given below by Jason. It is almost orthogonal in use to the "Its all text" plugin, which works great for me on WIndows but irritates me on macs for some reason (I uninstalled it, and now I can't remember exactly why). Using Sage for co

[sage-devel] Re: Sage public notebook servers

2008-10-14 Thread Dorian Raymer
Hi, This is a good discussion. It's interesting to see, after all this time, the public notebook being attacked! (exclaimed in the most respectful, positive, excited that now this problem really has to be solved manor :) Over the last few months I've been thinking about and working on the problems

[sage-devel] Final Sage 3.1.3 sources are out

2008-10-14 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3: #4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.py to 100%, and fix typos [Reviewed by John Cremona] #4272: Michael Abshoff: add the files from new coercion to the reference manual [Reviewed by Mike Hansen] #4279: Michael

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread Jason Grout
Stan Schymanski wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I think that most of the developers would agree with you, but bear in > mind that a large number of potential users come from the WYSIWYG icon > clicking world. These are often the same people that get discouraged by > the need of having to install optio

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread mabshoff
[X ] Yes, include TinyMCE as a standard package I see no benefit going the optional route if one needs to apply some patch, i.e. the burden to try it out is too high. The editor is well maintained, works on seemingly all browsers, has an active community and we should really have something li

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.rc0 released

2008-10-14 Thread Alex Ghitza
Builds fine and passes all tests on the 32-bit Gentoo box Linux artin 2.6.24-tuxonice-r9 #1 SMP Wed Oct 8 18:23:45 EST 2008 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Best, Alex On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:46 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks, >

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for TinyMCE spkg

2008-10-14 Thread kcrisman
On Oct 14, 11:11 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter wrote: > > There is a WYSIWYG equation plugin for TinyMCE that has a demo page at > >http://www.imathas.com/editordemo/demo.html. > > > On Firefox it uses MathML, and on other browsers it uses a graphics > > images fallback appr

[sage-devel] Re: Heaviside step and impulse functions

2008-10-14 Thread Georg
> You are right though, delta functions are not implemented yet. Of > course, they are not > really functions either, so how they should be implemented is an issue as > well. The delta functional is a linear functional on the vector space R^R which assigns the function value at zero to each fu

[sage-devel] Of possible use to the Sage project

2008-10-14 Thread Hazem
Just came across this code which may be of relevance: http://www.nag.co.uk/Projects/Frisco/frisco/node8.htm Hazem --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

[sage-devel] Re: Of possible use to the Sage project

2008-10-14 Thread David Joyner
I wonder if any of this code sponsored by NAG is truely FOSS. I didn't see any licensing statements though I didn't dig very deep. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Hazem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just came across this code which may be of relevance: > > http://www.nag.co.uk/Projects/Frisco

[sage-devel] Re: Sage public notebook servers

2008-10-14 Thread Jason Grout
> > Actually, the concept Timothy is talking about is true. The framework > for running notebook processes in Knoboo is very different from what > Sage does to serve notebooks. Indeed, the machine running actual > notebook processes (or engine processes as we call them) is considered > histo

[sage-devel] Re: Sage public notebook servers

2008-10-14 Thread Alex Clemesha
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:31 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 13, 3:05 pm, "Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi Timothy, > >> I had never heard of "fork bomb" until now. According to Wikipedia, >> it's somewhat preventable by implementing a limit of the number of

[sage-devel] Re: Final Sage 3.1.3 sources are out

2008-10-14 Thread Dan Drake
I built 3.1.3 with no trouble (parallel build now works), and in "make test" I got the usual failures with Lisp and Maxima [1]. But now I can't even start Sage! When I do "./sage" in the appropriate directory, I get the traceback in the attached file. The install log is at [2]. I edited the sage s