[sage-devel] notebook.setup() and domains

It seems that supplying a server different than the hostname to allow remote connections causes a backtrace in the notebook.setup() routine. My hostname file wasn't setup, so the choice was between localhost (for local connections) and localhost.localdomain (for remote connections). I supplied chi

[sage-devel] Re: Cell splitting/merging in notebook

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 4:35 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 09:17 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I've played with this some -- ctrl-s is frequently the shortcut

[sage-devel] Re: can't handle symmetric functions > 15?

Hello, I'm not able to reproduce your bug. Here is what I get: sage: s = SFASchur(QQ) sage: p = SFAPower(QQ) sage: s(p(s([14]))) s[14] sage: a = s(p(s([14])))*s([14]) sage: a s[14, 14] + s[15, 13] + s[16, 12] + s[17, 11] + s[18, 10] + s[19, 9] + s[20, 8] + s[21, 7] + s[22, 6] + s[23, 5] + s[24,

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE+Microsoft Virtual PC project

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have used Virtual PC and wonder why you think that a Virtual PC VM > will make "Sage easier to use and > install under Windows." It will make Sage much easier to use and install under Windows for employees of Microsoft, b

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE+Microsoft Virtual PC project

I have used Virtual PC and wonder why you think that a Virtual PC VM will make "Sage easier to use and install under Windows." --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL

[sage-devel] plot taking a very, very long time

In the notebook of sage-2.11: time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0) CPU time: 143.77 s, Wall time: 1660.39 s with a correct image. Maple is almost immediate. Even worse: time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x, 0.0, 1.0), plot_points=1000) CPU time: 244.71 s, Wall tim

[sage-devel] Re: plot taking a very, very long time

On Apr 6, 6:36 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the notebook of sage-2.11: > > time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0) > > CPU time: 143.77 s,  Wall time: 1660.39 s > > with a correct image. > > Maple is almost immediate. > > Even worse: > time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x

[sage-devel] Re: plot taking a very, very long time

mabshoff wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 6:36 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In the notebook of sage-2.11: >> >> time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0) >> >> CPU time: 143.77 s, Wall time: 1660.39 s >> >> with a correct image. >> >> Maple is almost immediate. >> >> Even worse: >>

[sage-devel] Re: plot taking a very, very long time

On Apr 6, 7:05 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 6:36 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In the notebook of sage-2.11: > > >> time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0) > > >> CPU time: 143.77 s,  Wall time: 1660.39 s > > >> with a corre

[sage-devel] Re: can't handle symmetric functions > 15?

Hello Mike (H), On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not able to reproduce your bug. Here is what I get: I am able to reproduce the bug (on an Intel machine; see below). > sage: s = SFASchur(QQ) > sage: p = SFAPower(QQ) > sage: s(p(s([14]))) > s[14

[sage-devel] Re: can't handle symmetric functions > 15?

On 6-Apr-08, at 11:10 AM, Franco Saliola wrote: > > Hello Mike (H), > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm not able to reproduce your bug. Here is what I get: > > I am able to reproduce the bug (on an Intel machine; see below). > >> sage: s = SFASc

[sage-devel] Re: plot taking a very, very long time

For the record, I ran into more or less the same phenomenon a couple of days ago, and again floor() was the culprit. Kiran On Apr 6, 1:16 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Apr 6, 7:05 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Apr 6, 6:3

[sage-devel] Re: can't handle symmetric functions > 15?

On Apr 6, 8:32 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6-Apr-08, at 11:10 AM, Franco Saliola wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Mike (H), > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>  I'm not able to reproduce your bug.  Here is what I get: > > > I am able

[sage-devel] Re: plot taking a very, very long time

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the notebook of sage-2.11: > > time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0) > > CPU time: 143.77 s, Wall time: 1660.39 s > > with a correct image. > > Maple is almost immediate. > > > Even worse: > time plot(1.

[sage-devel] Re: plot taking a very, very long time

William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In the notebook of sage-2.11: >> >> time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0) >> >> CPU time: 143.77 s, Wall time: 1660.39 s >> >> with a correct image. >> >> Maple is almost immediate. >> >

[sage-devel] Re: plot taking a very, very long time

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > William Stein wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In the notebook of sage-2.11: > >> > >> time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0) > >> > >> CPU time: 143

[sage-devel] Trac reports

I've added some new reports to trac: "tickets needing review" "tickets with positive review" "tickets with negative review" "tickets with patch" Of particular note, I've hard-coded the strings "patch", "positive", "negative", and "needs review" into these queries. This is suboptimal since tic

[sage-devel] Re: Trac reports

On Sunday 06 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've added some new reports to trac: > > "tickets needing review" > "tickets with positive review" > "tickets with negative review" > "tickets with patch" > > Of particular note, I've hard-coded the strings "patch", "positive", > "negative", and

[sage-devel] Re: plot taking a very, very long time

mabshoff wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 6:36 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In the notebook of sage-2.11: >> >> time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0) >> >> CPU time: 143.77 s, Wall time: 1660.39 s >> >> with a correct image. >> >> Maple is almost immediate. >> >> Even worse: >>

[sage-devel] Re: Trac reports

On Apr 6, 10:08 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 06 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I've added some new reports to trac: > > > "tickets needing review" > > "tickets with positive review" > > "tickets with negative review" > > "tickets with patch" > > > Of par

[sage-devel] Re: Experimental Gröbner Bases over Rin gs via Singular CVS

-- Forwarded message -- Date: 04.04.2008 20:47 Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Experimental Gröbner Bases over Rings via Singular CVS To: sage-devel@googlegroups.com You have to define #define HAVE_RINGS to use any rings at all. I am not sure if this is the problem. ... Oli

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: [Maxima] Maxima 5.15.0 release candidate 1

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 3:51 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder if we want to include maxima 5.15 in sage 3.0? > There were some issues with Maxima 5.14 giving wrong answers so we'll see if they're resolved in 5.15. --Mike --~--~-~--~~~---~--~--

[sage-devel] Fwd: [Maxima] Maxima 5.15.0 release candidate 1

I wonder if we want to include maxima 5.15 in sage 3.0? -- Forwarded message -- From: Robert Dodier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:36 PM Subject: [Maxima] Maxima 5.15.0 release candidate 1 To: Maxima List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello, I've resolved the build pro

[sage-devel] Sage 3.0.alpha2 released

Hello folks, this is Sage 3.0.alpha2. Up to now we closed 111 tickets. But things are still of alpha quality: Issue: Invalid read in libgroebner.so (#2822) - this happens with each sage session and results on occasional segfautls at exit. They look like *** glibc detected *** corrupted double-l