Hello,
> > If not ==, what would you propose for creating symbolic expression
> > objects? The other obvious choice is eq(f, g), but I think that this
> > is inferior since it is much harder to guess.
>
> How often does one need an equation *outside solve*? I never did!
> So, if one really wants
On Feb 9, 3:20 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I remember reading somewhere when I downloaded a version of Sage that
> the program was soliciting help from mac-experts in making the binary
> version of Sage a little more mac-like.
Sure, that is certainly a goal.
> I'
First the bad news:
--
| SAGE Version 2.10.1, Release Date: 2008-02-02 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
-
--
| SAGE Version 2.10.1, Release Date: 2008-02-02 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
--
sage: x=Polyn
I am running into a permissions problem on a SAGE install relocated by
"make install" which was run as root and installed into DESTDIR=/usr/
lib. Below is an example of a permissions problem. It looks like a
writable directory check is failing. Which directory is it? Which
directories need to be w
On Feb 10, 10:07 pm, gri6507 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I am running into a permissions problem on a SAGE install relocated by
> "make install" which was run as root and installed into DESTDIR=/usr/
> lib. Below is an example of a permissions problem. It looks like a
> writable directory
Hi,
trac is down at the moment. I am on the road, so I probably won't fix
it any time soon.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Feb 10, 6:58 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First the bad news:
> --
> | SAGE Version 2.10.1, Release Date: 2008-02-02 |
> | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.
On Feb 10, 2008 5:20 PM, Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2008 8:14 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How do we want the Sage LiveCD that you have in mind to work?
> > When you start it, does it just start a notebook server? I'm curious
> > what functionalit
On Feb 10, 2008 5:08 PM, Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I missed your message on IRC.
>
> I am updating the livecd and we used to run the notebook at boot time
> like this:
>
> /usr/local/sage/sage -notebook /root/sage_notebook 80
>
> Now in the new notebook, like you explained
On Feb 9, 2008 4:23 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Sage team,
>
> in the thread
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/6c0b377a37ee32ec/a2e56d5696b8198e?hl=en#a2e56d5696b8198e
> i was asking if there is a tensor product for homomorphisms between
> fr
On Feb 10, 2008 3:24 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> trac is down at the moment. I am on the road, so I probably won't fix
> it any time soon.
I restarted it and it works fine now.
-- William
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
> >
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathema
>>> How do we want the Sage LiveCD that you have in mind to work?
>>> When you start it, does it just start a notebook server? I'm curious
>>> what functionality you have in mind exactly that involves autostarting
>>> the notebook. Thanks.
>>
>> :-), well actually the first version we did (longgg
I'm having a weird problem, I think with the test framework.
I have a clean build of 2.10.1, and clone a new branch.
In this branch, I can do ./sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py,
and all tests pass.
Now I edit that file arith.py. At line 874, I change
sage: random_prime(10)
On Feb 10, 2008 6:02 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm having a weird problem, I think with the test framework.
>
> I have a clean build of 2.10.1, and clone a new branch.
>
> In this branch, I can do ./sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py,
> and all tests pass.
>
> Now I edit
On Feb 10, 2008 5:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> How do we want the Sage LiveCD that you have in mind to work?
> >>> When you start it, does it just start a notebook server? I'm curious
> >>> what functionality you have in mind exactly that involves autostarting
> >>> the notebook. Th
On Feb 10, 2008, at 9:13 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Any line with "random" anywhere in it is replaced by
>
>sage: _ = [the original line]
>
>[original output] <--- gets ignored because of the newline
>
> This is so doctests with random output can still be run using exactly
> the sa
I think the issue was that I was running on a system which had a
relocated sage v2.9.3 prior to a relocated sage v2.10.1 (current
version) and the location of the matplotlibrc file changed between the
two sage version. All I did was remove the ~/.matplotlib and the
~/.sage directories and now plot
Hi John,
> sage: x=PolynomialRing(ZZ,'x').gen()
> sage: f=x^2+1
> sage: R=f.parent().extension(f)
This is actually where the issue is: I think you want
f.base_ring().extension(f). At least, that's what would get you ZZ[i],
which is what you are expecting below. Indeed:
sage: f.parent()
Univari
> BTW this is a hack for two reasons. The "lesser hack" is that it
> rewrites code that is supposed to have random output. I suppose I can
> live with this. But the "greater hack", which is much more confusing
> to me, is that it gets applied for any line containing the string
> "random"!! That's
On Feb 10, 2008 8:31 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > BTW this is a hack for two reasons. The "lesser hack" is that it
> > rewrites code that is supposed to have random output. I suppose I can
> > live with this. But the "greater hack", which is much more confusing
> > to me, is
> (*) Have you used search_src before? It's one of my favorite utilities
> for tracking things down, especially since I did a search_src?? ... My
> issue was that I had to search a few times, because if the function is
> cdef'd, or cpdef'd, there might be a return value, etc. However,
> looking at
22 matches
Mail list logo
