On Sep 17, 3:13 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Sep 17, 12:16 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just wanted to say awesome and keep up the good work. I'll be
> > testing Sage on Solaris/x86 soon.
>
> Well, we are getting very close now:
>
> Ha
Here are times comparing Magma and Pari for computations of class
groups this time on Magma's terms, i.e. I certify the computations in
Pari using bnfcertify.
The Pari manual insists that the result is unconditional and the Magma
manual claims the same.
Note that Pari also computes fundamental u
On Sep 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>> For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed things so that the
>> public notebook server:
>>(1) Doesn't use ssl at all, and
>>(2) Is at http://sagenb.org (and another at http://
>> sagenb.com), so
>> there is no funn
I thought the problem is that no one has configured Apache on
sage.math to use SSL for use with sagenb.org and sagenb.com.
On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> >> For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed thing
On 9/17/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
> I thought the problem is that no one has configured Apache on
> sage.math to use SSL for use with sagenb.org and sagenb.com.
>
Timothy is right. The main reason that I turned off ssl is
that I have not been able to configure apache to corr
On Sep 16, 2007, at 10:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On 9/16/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> (0) The talk on SAGE went quite well and generated interest.
Glad to hear.
>> Which basic commands (like polynomial
>> multiplication) can be parallelized?
[...]
> So I think nontrivi
On Sep 13, 8:16 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:11 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Since nobody says they can't do Thursday, September 20th (one week
> > from today), let's have
>
> > ***
> >
On 9/17/07, Peter G. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have recently discovered SAGE, which I think is really quite amazing.
>
> I am contemplating introducing the students in our honors calculus course
> here at Dartmouth to SAGE. I'm a bit leery about this, since I'm new to
> SAGE
> myself.
On 9/17/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/17/07, Peter G. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have recently discovered SAGE, which I think is really quite amazing.
> >
> > I am contemplating introducing the students in our honors calculus course
> > here at Dartmouth to SAGE.
- Original Message -
From: William Stein
> One possibly nasty possibility would be to allow Magma-like notation:
> sage: [1..4]
> [1, 2, 3, 4]
>
> How does one specify an integer range in Maple, Mathematica, Maxima?
In Maple it is similar to Magma, $1..4 produces 1,2,3,4. Also, .. is u
2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Didier, does "sage -testall" pass on your install?
Actually, I stopped at lapack due to lack of time. I'm plan to
continue where I left things off on thursday (a little before sbd 3
officially starts).
didier
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>
> >
>
--~--~--
On 9/17/07, Peter Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/17/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/17/07, Peter G. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > -- It's still far from clear to me what `downloading' and `uploading'
> are
> > > supposed to mean.
> >
> >
> > It's suppose
On Sep 16, 2007, at 6:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
> I'm implementing a subfields command that returns
> a list of all subfields of a number field K. It should be possible
> to make it so each subfield canonically coerces into K.
> How do I do that with your new coercion code? Is enough
> written
On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:21 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On 9/17/07, Peter Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/17/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/17/07, Peter G. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > -- It's still far from clear to me what `downloading' and
> `uploadin
On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 6:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > I'm implementing a subfields command that returns
> > a list of all subfields of a number field K. It should be possible
> > to make it so each subfield canonically coerces into K.
> > How d
On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It sounds from what you write though, that it is best to just stick
> > with the "upload" / "download" terminology, since it is *very* clear
> > in which direction the file goes in each case. Upload means "goes
> > to the server (SAGE no
This is being cc'd to sage-devel, since no reason not to. It's me
and Robert Bradshaw working on reworking the algebraic number
theory code in Sage (we've done a lot now).
On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, I've been working on quadratic number field elements...
Tha
> Robert, Since you do so much work on Cython, maybe you could think
> about the formal specification of the Python language and see whether
> ..
> not appearing in a string is ever valid Python. I.e., could we add
> [expr1 .. expr2]
> to the language without running into problems?
Muc
On 9/17/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Robert, Since you do so much work on Cython, maybe you could think
> > about the formal specification of the Python language and see whether
> > ..
> > not appearing in a string is ever valid Python. I.e., could we add
> > [ex
Yeah, I'm not sure if the benefits would be worth breaking such a
strong Python convention.I'd rather have consistency since it
appears so often in other places.
I'd vote against.
--Mike
On 9/17/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Robert, Since you do so much work on Cython,
On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
> This is being cc'd to sage-devel, since no reason not to. It's me
> and Robert Bradshaw working on reworking the algebraic number
> theory code in Sage (we've done a lot now).
>
> On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I'
21 matches
Mail list logo