[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.3 on Solaris - A New Hope

2007-09-17 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 17, 3:13 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Sep 17, 12:16 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just wanted to say awesome and keep up the good work. I'll be > > testing Sage on Solaris/x86 soon. > > Well, we are getting very close now: > > Ha

[sage-devel] Number Field Timings : Part 2

2007-09-17 Thread Bill Hart
Here are times comparing Magma and Pari for computations of class groups this time on Magma's terms, i.e. I certify the computations in Pari using bnfcertify. The Pari manual insists that the result is unconditional and the Magma manual claims the same. Note that Pari also computes fundamental u

[sage-devel] Re: sage+gap conf stuff

2007-09-17 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sep 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote: >> For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed things so that the >> public notebook server: >>(1) Doesn't use ssl at all, and >>(2) Is at http://sagenb.org (and another at http:// >> sagenb.com), so >> there is no funn

[sage-devel] Re: sage+gap conf stuff

2007-09-17 Thread Timothy Clemans
I thought the problem is that no one has configured Apache on sage.math to use SSL for use with sagenb.org and sagenb.com. On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > >> For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed thing

[sage-devel] Re: sage+gap conf stuff

2007-09-17 Thread William Stein
On 9/17/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > I thought the problem is that no one has configured Apache on > sage.math to use SSL for use with sagenb.org and sagenb.com. > Timothy is right. The main reason that I turned off ssl is that I have not been able to configure apache to corr

[sage-devel] Re: sage+gap conf stuff

2007-09-17 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sep 16, 2007, at 10:53 AM, William Stein wrote: > On 9/16/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> (0) The talk on SAGE went quite well and generated interest. Glad to hear. >> Which basic commands (like polynomial >> multiplication) can be parallelized? [...] > So I think nontrivi

[sage-devel] Re: Sage BugSquash Day 3

2007-09-17 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 13, 8:16 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:11 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > Since nobody says they can't do Thursday, September 20th (one week > > from today), let's have > > > *** > >

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread William Stein
On 9/17/07, Peter G. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have recently discovered SAGE, which I think is really quite amazing. > > I am contemplating introducing the students in our honors calculus course > here at Dartmouth to SAGE. I'm a bit leery about this, since I'm new to > SAGE > myself.

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread David Joyner
On 9/17/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/17/07, Peter G. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have recently discovered SAGE, which I think is really quite amazing. > > > > I am contemplating introducing the students in our honors calculus course > > here at Dartmouth to SAGE.

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread Alec Mihailovs
- Original Message - From: William Stein > One possibly nasty possibility would be to allow Magma-like notation: > sage: [1..4] > [1, 2, 3, 4] > > How does one specify an integer range in Maple, Mathematica, Maxima? In Maple it is similar to Magma, $1..4 produces 1,2,3,4. Also, .. is u

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.3 on Solaris - A New Hope

2007-09-17 Thread didier deshommes
2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Didier, does "sage -testall" pass on your install? Actually, I stopped at lapack due to lack of time. I'm plan to continue where I left things off on thursday (a little before sbd 3 officially starts). didier > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > > > --~--~--

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread William Stein
On 9/17/07, Peter Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/17/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/17/07, Peter G. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -- It's still far from clear to me what `downloading' and `uploading' > are > > > supposed to mean. > > > > > > It's suppose

[sage-devel] Re: installing canonical coercions

2007-09-17 Thread William Stein
On Sep 16, 2007, at 6:20 PM, William Stein wrote: > I'm implementing a subfields command that returns > a list of all subfields of a number field K. It should be possible > to make it so each subfield canonically coerces into K. > How do I do that with your new coercion code? Is enough > written

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:21 PM, William Stein wrote: > On 9/17/07, Peter Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/17/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/17/07, Peter G. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -- It's still far from clear to me what `downloading' and > `uploadin

[sage-devel] Re: installing canonical coercions

2007-09-17 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Sep 16, 2007, at 6:20 PM, William Stein wrote: > > I'm implementing a subfields command that returns > > a list of all subfields of a number field K. It should be possible > > to make it so each subfield canonically coerces into K. > > How d

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread William Stein
On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It sounds from what you write though, that it is best to just stick > > with the "upload" / "download" terminology, since it is *very* clear > > in which direction the file goes in each case. Upload means "goes > > to the server (SAGE no

[sage-devel] Re: number fields

2007-09-17 Thread William Stein
This is being cc'd to sage-devel, since no reason not to. It's me and Robert Bradshaw working on reworking the algebraic number theory code in Sage (we've done a lot now). On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, I've been working on quadratic number field elements... Tha

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread Nick Alexander
> Robert, Since you do so much work on Cython, maybe you could think > about the formal specification of the Python language and see whether > .. > not appearing in a string is ever valid Python. I.e., could we add > [expr1 .. expr2] > to the language without running into problems? Muc

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread William Stein
On 9/17/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Robert, Since you do so much work on Cython, maybe you could think > > about the formal specification of the Python language and see whether > > .. > > not appearing in a string is ever valid Python. I.e., could we add > > [ex

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus

2007-09-17 Thread Mike Hansen
Yeah, I'm not sure if the benefits would be worth breaking such a strong Python convention.I'd rather have consistency since it appears so often in other places. I'd vote against. --Mike On 9/17/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Robert, Since you do so much work on Cython,

[sage-devel] Re: number fields

2007-09-17 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:00 PM, William Stein wrote: > This is being cc'd to sage-devel, since no reason not to. It's me > and Robert Bradshaw working on reworking the algebraic number > theory code in Sage (we've done a lot now). > > On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, I'