"make list-broken-packages" now works both on macOS and Linux -
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34203 (needs review)
On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 7:16:11 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 3:30:44 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 a
This is documented
in
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html#sec-installation-conda-develop
On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 1:02:22 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2022, 07:25 Nils Bruin, wrote:
>
>>
>> It seems that the correct way to use "system" packages
On Thu, 21 Jul 2022, 07:25 Nils Bruin, wrote:
>
> It seems that the correct way to use "system" packages in an
>> upgradeable way is to make sure that Sage is such a package itself.
>> Here "system" means either your OS, or Conda.
>> And Conda comes with a quite fresh version of Sage, so it looks
> It seems that the correct way to use "system" packages in an
> upgradeable way is to make sure that Sage is such a package itself.
> Here "system" means either your OS, or Conda.
> And Conda comes with a quite fresh version of Sage, so it looks as if
> it might be what you want.
>
I'm pre
On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 3:30:44 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 3:20:25 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
>
>> Isn't there at least something that can systematically check which
>> dependencies are still in place and which are not, and then just rebuild
>> what'
On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 3:20:25 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> It looks like currently sage is not properly fixing the foundations of its
> prerequisites.
>
If you want integration with your system package manager, use the sagemath
package from that repository.
--
You received this messa
On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 3:20:25 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> Isn't there at least something that can systematically check which
> dependencies are still in place and which are not, and then just rebuild
> what's necessary?
>
Yes, I think we can do that. I have
opened https://trac.sagem
On Wednesday, 20 July 2022 at 15:06:09 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> You said you did "dnf update". That's what it does, it changes system
> packages.
>
>
It's also what people are encouraged to run quite regularly in order for
vulnerabilities to be fixed on a reasonable time scale.
A sour
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:59 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 20 July 2022 at 14:01:25 UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> by default, Sage will be using the system python3, sure.
>> And gmp, flint, ntl, mpfr, arb, pari, ecl, singular, R, glpk, etc etc etc
>>
> so .. the rebuild of sage
On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 2:59:26 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20 July 2022 at 14:01:25 UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> by default, Sage will be using the system python3, sure.
>> And gmp, flint, ntl, mpfr, arb, pari, ecl, singular, R, glpk, etc etc etc
>>
>> so .. the r
On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 2:59:26 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> [...] progressing towards a way that sage is properly integrated and that
> "dnf install sagemath" just works
>
That actually works but has nothing to do with the Sage distribution.
Fedora has an up to date distribution package
On Wednesday, 20 July 2022 at 14:01:25 UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> by default, Sage will be using the system python3, sure.
> And gmp, flint, ntl, mpfr, arb, pari, ecl, singular, R, glpk, etc etc etc
>
> so .. the rebuild of sage indeed worked; with "make -j8" it timed it at 8
minutes (af
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:43 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> I've noticed that after a modest upgrade (just "dnf update"), with some
> regularity sage breaks. In the most recent edition, "libflint.so" couldn't be
> found.
>
> I guess there is some prerequisite that sage was relying on to be provided by
13 matches
Mail list logo
