Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

On Aug 30, Matthias Koeppe wrote: On Sunday, August 30, 2020 at 9:51:27 AM UTC-7, Reimundo Heluani wrote: Are those tickets that are closed now going to be in 9.2? Yes, they will appear in the next beta / rc.   If so I could write something about Lie conformal algebras. That would be

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

On Sunday, August 30, 2020 at 9:51:27 AM UTC-7, Reimundo Heluani wrote: > > Are those tickets that are closed now going to be in 9.2? > Yes, they will appear in the next beta / rc. > If so I could write something about Lie conformal algebras. > That would be great! -- You received this mess

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

Are those tickets that are closed now going to be in 9.2? If so I could write something about Lie conformal algebras. Depending on how long for the next release I don't think there's going to be time to review the vertex algebra ticket so perhaps this is the time to add something about LCAs Bes

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

Thank you! I have combined it with the section on unicode identifiers. On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 11:11:50 PM UTC-7, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > I added some comments about unicode art. If someone else wants, this could > possibly be expanded to include better unicode support elsewhere in S

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

Thank you, I have added it. On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 12:38:56 PM UTC-7, c.ed...@gmail.com wrote: > > I just noticed 30243 has been closed but not merged yet; I've gone ahead > and attached a snippet and an image if you'd like to add it to the release > tour; it would fit as a subsection u

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

I added some comments about unicode art. If someone else wants, this could possibly be expanded to include better unicode support elsewhere in Sage. Best, Travis On Sunday, August 30, 2020 at 5:38:56 AM UTC+10, c.ed...@gmail.com wrote: > > I just noticed 30243 has been closed but not merged yet

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

I just noticed 30243 has been closed but not merged yet; I've gone ahead and attached a snippet and an image if you'd like to add it to the release tour; it would fit as a subsection under Combinatorics. I'll see about getting a legacy trac account in the future. Thanks! -- Chase On Thursday,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:00 PM Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > We could also decide to migrate the release notes > to the Trac Wiki. Then everyone who can participate > in Trac tickets can also participate in the release notes. IMHO we would not want to further tie us up to trac, it's probably inevit

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

We could also decide to migrate the release notes to the Trac Wiki. Then everyone who can participate in Trac tickets can also participate in the release notes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and sto

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:09:10AM -0700, c.ed...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm one of the authors of 30243 on > the enumeration/manipulation of fully commutative elements in Coxeter > groups. I'd be happy to add a short section on it under Combi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2

Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:09 AM c.ed...@gmail.com wrote: > > I'm one of the authors of 30243 on the enumeration/manipulation of fully > commutative elements in Coxeter groups. I'd be happy to add a short section > on it under Combinatorics, but I'm not sure how to log in to the wiki. The