Re: [sage-devel] Re: achieving 90% coverage

2012-11-11 Thread William Stein
Hi, We should remove that code for loading old notebook server installs. We established a 1-year deprecation policy for the Sage project long ago, and that applies here. The functionality being deprecated is "read a notebook server install in a certain format", and it has been deprecated for abou

Re: [sage-devel] Re: achieving 90% coverage

2012-11-11 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-11-11 00:17, David Kirkby wrote: > I'm guessing nobody is going to write any doctests for code which is > only there to maintain backward compatibility. So if it remains > untested, why should it be removed from the test figures? +1 on this. This is code which is apparently still used (if o

Re: [sage-devel] Re: achieving 90% coverage

2012-11-10 Thread David Kirkby
On 10 November 2012 21:49, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > On Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:41:01 PM UTC-8, Nils Bruin wrote: >> >> On Nov 10, 1:35 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> > By the way, to clarify: this will only affect the 'server' directory. >> > which >> > consists of unused code (old no