On 2012-11-11 00:17, David Kirkby wrote: > I'm guessing nobody is going to write any doctests for code which is > only there to maintain backward compatibility. So if it remains > untested, why should it be removed from the test figures? +1 on this. This is code which is apparently still used (if only for backwards compatibility) but untested. So it's genuinely missing doctest coverage.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
