On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 8/14/10 10:46 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12 Ago, 09:49, Jason Grout wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/22/10 2:36 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
I have a quick question that is related to engineering support (I was
reading the doc
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:43 AM, dagss wrote:
> On Jul 11, 12:20 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> 2. Sage at EuroScipy:
>>
>> Another thing -- though most talks mention Cython, not one single talk
>> given about actual engineers/scientists doing work even mentioned Sage
>> -- and there were over 30 ta
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:42:53AM -0700, Maurizio wrote:
> By the way, some
> time ago we managed to run spyder letting it use the sage console as
> interpreter, which was kind of fun, but never used it extensively.
Did you keep a log of what exactly you did to achieve this? After
seeing an impre
quate" sampling depends on the zoom...
Dag Sverre Seljebotn
-Original Message-
From: William Stein
Date: Wednesday, Jul 14, 2010 1:57 am
Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Re: IDE's; science/engineering
To: sage-devel@googlegroups.com,sage-notebook
, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Maurizio wrote:
> how do you get the new canvas with matplotlib 1.0? I installed it
> today, but from matplotlib.rcsetup.all_backends I don't get any item
> which looks like html5 canvas
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9471
>
> Maurizio
>
> On 14 Lug, 1
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio wrote:
> Hi
>
>>
>> Very interesting.
>>
>> 1. How does the speed of the Sage notebook running locally on your
>> computer compare to Spyder locally on your computer?
>>
>
> I don't think they can be comparable, doing so different functions...
> Anyway I a
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:57 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Maurizio wrote:
[...]
>> The problem I see now regarding scientific computing, is the not so
>> seamless integration of numpy-scipy: do you think SAGE may improve
>> numpy arrays management with cleaner synta
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Maurizio wrote:
> I just spend a couple of words about IDEs. I've personally spent a
> decent amount of time on Spyder and Eric, and my impressions are:
> - Eric is very well suited for general software development, it is not
> completely polished, and it lacks (at
