On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:02 PM Daniel Krenn wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2018 02:33 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> > Let me make one important comment (something that I've said before
> > though): a large part of what makes the current workflow work is not so
> > much Trac itself but our git server and the "g
Keeping in mind that this is still sort of off-topic, in my mind, from
the subject at hand which is allowing merge request submissions from
GitLab, which still get turned into Trac tickets...
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:33 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Let me make one important comment (something tha
On 09/04/2018 02:33 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Let me make one important comment (something that I've said before
> though): a large part of what makes the current workflow work is not so
> much Trac itself but our git server and the "git trac" scripts.
>
> For example, I very much like the fact
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:33 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Let me make one important comment (something that I've said before
> though): a large part of what makes the current workflow work is not so
> much Trac itself but our git server and the "git trac" scripts.
>
> For example, I very much like
Let me make one important comment (something that I've said before
though): a large part of what makes the current workflow work is not so
much Trac itself but our git server and the "git trac" scripts.
For example, I very much like the fact that we have a single git repo
where all pull reques
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:04 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-09-03 15:53, Erik Bray wrote:
> > P.S. If anyone has additional comments, positive or negative, on
> > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25914 they would be most appreciated
>
> That doesn't seem the right ticket.
No, that's the righ
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, 16:54 Erik Bray, wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:43 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Earlier this spring Julian Rüth and I sat down and created a mirror of
> > Sage's repository over at GitLab:
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/sagemath/sage
> >
> > This is in additio
On 2018-09-03 15:53, Erik Bray wrote:
P.S. If anyone has additional comments, positive or negative, on
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25914 they would be most appreciated
That doesn't seem the right ticket.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-d
The unfamiliar trac workflow was a barrier of entry for me, definitely
delaying my first contribution. It has some advantages but having gitlab as
an option for newcomers would be nice. +1 from me.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:54 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:43 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> > What does everyone think? Is there anyone opposed to going ahead and
> > opening up merge requests?
>
> 4x +1 (not including myself, which is an additional +1)
> 1x +0 (how I am interpretin
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:25 PM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> On 2018-08-22, Erik Bray wrote:
> > Really the workflow is meant to be you create an issue first, and then
> > you create one or more pull requests to resolve that issue. I am also
> > a fan of being able to "elevate" an issue t
On 08/23/2018 11:15 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> github has a command line tool, called hub, allowing one to e.g. create pull
> requests and issues, without using a browser.
> https://hub.github.com/hub-pull-request.1.html
> https://hub.github.com/hub-issue.1.html
>
> I don't know whether gitlab h
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:08 AM Simon King wrote:
>
> Tue 2018-08-21 08:43:19 UTC, Erik Bray:
> > What does everyone think? Is there anyone opposed to going ahead and
> > opening up merge requests?
>
> Is the plan to successively reduce the usage of our current trac system
> and completely move t
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:47 PM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le mardi 21 août 2018 10:43:19 UTC+2, Erik Bray a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Why GitLab? In short, we felt it would likely be more acceptable to
>> most members of the Sage community; this was a feeling we had even
>> before the Microsoft'
14 matches
Mail list logo
