I have personally mostly eliminated the use of LD_LIBRARY_PATH from my linux
cluster
in favour of coding runpath in programs and libraries so that it is never an
issue (the only
exception would be openfoam I think).
In the case of gcc, it means changing the specs (as in gcc -dumpspecs) to
enfor
The compile completed. I have installed it in the "official" location. I
will now ask the user to run it through its paces.
Thanks for your help
Cindy
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 11:16:29 AM UTC-6, crook...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thank you. I had forgotten to include the gcc "lib64" dire
Thank you. I had forgotten to include the gcc "lib64" directory in my
LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I have updated the appropriate module file. I will see
what happens next.
Cindy
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 5:59:51 PM UTC-6, François wrote:
>
> It looks like something has gone wrong with LD_LIBRARY_P
It looks like something has gone wrong with LD_LIBRARY_PATH & co. This means
that libstdc++ found when running sage is from older version of gcc than the
one used
to compile sage. Here you find libstdc++ from the system (gcc-4.3.4 I presume)
rather
than whatever you used to compile.
I assume yo
It didn't seem to like just changing the effective group and failed almost
immediately trying to build gcc. I have started afresh with hpcapps as the
effective group and will see how far I can get.
On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 3:38:28 PM UTC-6, François wrote:
>
> Nothing to do apart from “m
Nothing to do apart from “make”.
> On 9/01/2015, at 10:21, crooksc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thank you. I will give it a try.
>
> Pardon my ignorance, but is there anything I have to do to pick up the "make"
> where I left off? Or, do I need to start from the beginning?
>
> Cindy
>
> On Thur
Thank you. I will give it a try.
Pardon my ignorance, but is there anything I have to do to pick up the
"make" where I left off? Or, do I need to start from the beginning?
Cindy
On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 2:41:12 PM UTC-6, François wrote:
>
> Not completely sure since the error is abou
Not completely sure since the error is about the folder’s group permission but
that’s worth a try.
I am not sure how the “security” stuff has been implemented, it may be that the
group is outside
a deemed safe range.
Hum, this was implemented here:
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/master/bui
OSorry, I should have said I am NOT part of the root group. I was typing
too fast.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googl
O
> I am part of the root group. Below is the list of groups that I am part
> of:
>
gid=255(hpcadmin)
groups=255(hpcadmin),254(hpc),702(techgrp),23171(hpcapps),23173(hpctrain),42124(hpc-vasp),44679(hpc-reems),47919(hpc-sys),61860(rsmadmins)
The directories and software that I have mentio
That’s interesting, would you belong to an admin group or even the root group?
Or more likely you set the group ownership and permission for this folder to
something that’s
not acceptable for the python shipped by sage.
François
> On 9/01/2015, at 08:43, crooksc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I am tryi
11 matches
Mail list logo
