On Saturday, June 21, 2014 9:06:39 PM UTC-7, 张秦川 wrote:
>
> I use Sage 6.1.1 which I build from source code on my x86 Ubuntu14.04
>
The x86 is the key here. The flint announcement mentions that this bug only
affects 64 bit platforms.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
I use Sage 6.1.1 which I build from source code on my x86 Ubuntu14.04
William Stein 提到：
>
>On Jun 21, 2014 7:17 PM, "gofortu...@gmail.com" wrote:
>>
>> I didn't get such answer as you got,my Sage factor 2007193456621 correctly.
>> N.factor() returns 1001797*2003593.
>> Did you use an old version
On Jun 21, 2014 7:17 PM, "gofortu...@gmail.com"
wrote:
>
> I didn't get such answer as you got,my Sage factor 2007193456621
correctly.
> N.factor() returns 1001797*2003593.
> Did you use an old version of Sage?
>
What version are *you* using?
>
>
> 發自我的小米手機
>
> John Cremona 提到：
>
> >I noticed an
I didn't get such answer as you got,my Sage factor 2007193456621 correctly.
N.factor() returns 1001797*2003593.
Did you use an old version of Sage?
發自我的小米手機
John Cremona 提到：
>I noticed an announcement on the flint-dev list which led me to try
>this, and indeed we have the bug:
>
>sage: n=20071
On 18 June 2014 16:49, David Roe wrote:
> We are using flint:
>
> if mpz_fits_slong_p(n.value):
>
> n_factor(&f, mpz_get_ui(n.value), proof)
>
> where n_factor is defined in sage.libs.flint.ulong_extras.
Thanks, David -- this explains what is happening (remember that I got
this value
We are using flint:
if mpz_fits_slong_p(n.value):
n_factor(&f, mpz_get_ui(n.value), proof)
where n_factor is defined in sage.libs.flint.ulong_extras.
David
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:28 AM, John Cremona
wrote:
> I noticed an announcement on the flint-dev list which led me to try
