Dear William, dear David,
Very few categories are left unreviewed. Please comment shortly on the
points below, or set a positive review!
Cheers,
Nicolas
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:04:45AM +0200, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at
Dear William, dear David, Dear Javier,
Yippee, there remains essentially only eight categories left to review!
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:04:45AM +0200, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 05:23:15PM +0200, David R. Kohel wrote:
> > I put of positive review of most of the as
Dear David, dear Javier,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 05:23:15PM +0200, David R. Kohel wrote:
> I put of positive review of most of the assigned category files.
Excellent! Thanks much!
> Note that I hadn't downloaded those attributed to Javier, so these
> are still outstanding.
Feel free to
Dear David, dear category fans,
I just finished bringing all categories to 100% doctests, except the
following ones:
sets_cat
algebras_with_basis
examples/hopf_algebras_with_basis
See: http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/wiki/CategoriesCategoriesReview
In particular,
Dear Franco, dear category fans,
I just finished bringing AdditiveCommutativeSemigroups and friend
categories to 100% doctests. Would you have any chance to review them
in the coming days? Since they are very close from their
multiplicative counterparts, that should be a very quick job fo
Dear David, dear category fans,
We made some good progress on the review of the main category patch.
Most of the (hopf) algebra categories were reviewed by Florent Hivert,
and the semigroup/monoid ones by Franco Saliola. See the progress
report on:
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/wiki/Cate
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas M.
Thiery wrote:
>
> Hi David (K),
>
> How far are you with the review of the category patch?
>
> I am with Florent and Franco at RISC, and will give a hard blow of
> doctest tomorrow. We would like to avoid doing things where you may
> already have
Hi David (K),
How far are you with the review of the category patch?
I am with Florent and Franco at RISC, and will give a hard blow of
doctest tomorrow. We would like to avoid doing things where you may
already have done some.
Thanks for your quick reply!
Cheers,
Yep. I don't have time tomorrow, but I can be on IRC Sunday afternoon.
David
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> > >and source introspection for dynamic classes. Someone should
> > >review these (along with the rest of my changes)
> >
> > I will make this into
> >and source introspection for dynamic classes. Someone should
> >review these (along with the rest of my changes)
>
> I will make this into a reviewer's patch for the dynamic_class patch
> #5991, and review it.
Done. Can you double check http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/5991
and,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:46:27PM -0700, David Roe wrote:
>I've updated my review patches (categories-framework-ref-dr.patch and the
>small categories-tensorial_rename-dr.patch).
I just reviewed your reviewer patch this morning. Wow, thanks for the
massive work!
>Unfortunately, I
I've updated my review patches (categories-framework-ref-dr.patch and the
small categories-tensorial_rename-dr.patch). Unfortunately, I won't be able
to work on this much more in the next month and a half.
categories-framework is quite close to getting a positive review; the
following are the main
Hi David (K),
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:41:40PM +0200, David R. Kohel wrote:
> I think the sage-combinat build should help. During Sage Days 16 in
> Barcelona I tried naively applying the one patch you or William asked
> me to review but it failed to apply.
Hmm, did you receive the
Dear David Kohel,
Can I be of any help for the reviewing of the category patch? Do you
have a timeline for your progress on this?
Best,
Nicolas
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:58:34AM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:29:47PM +0
Dear David,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:29:47PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:58 AM, wrote:
> > Hi William,
> >
> > I'd be happy to have a look at referee this.
Thanks so much for looking at this!
> > Do I need to apply the dozen or so patches, or what is requ
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:58 AM, wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> I'd be happy to have a look at referee this. Do I need to apply
> the dozen or so patches, or what is required? The challenge for
> the referee seems to be to sort out what has been refereed, what
> needs careful inspection.
I don't kn
16 matches
Mail list logo
