On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:59:17 AM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I think that if you do "sage -i git_trac", it should install it for you.
>
Works but will give you an older version. It should work, but if you run
into problems you should try the newest version first. Also, it'll be
erase
On Tue, 27 May 2014 17:59:17 John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 5:06:16 PM UTC-7, François wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 May 2014 06:57:53 Volker Braun wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:54:56 AM UTC+1, Thierry
> > >
> > > (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
> > > > In short, what is the
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 5:06:16 PM UTC-7, François wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 06:57:53 Volker Braun wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:54:56 AM UTC+1, Thierry
> >
> > (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
> > > In short, what is the git command to get a summary of the changes
> related
>
On Wed, 14 May 2014 06:57:53 Volker Braun wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:54:56 AM UTC+1, Thierry
>
> (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
> > In short, what is the git command to get a summary of the changes related
> > to a package
>
> git log build/pkgs/
>
> git trac find
>
> Various combin
On Wed, 14 May 2014 06:57:53 Volker Braun wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:54:56 AM UTC+1, Thierry
>
> (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
> > In short, what is the git command to get a summary of the changes related
> > to a package
>
> git log build/pkgs/
>
> git trac find
>
I am guessing t
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:54:56 AM UTC+1, Thierry
(sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
>
> In short, what is the git command to get a summary of the changes related
> to a package
git log build/pkgs/
git trac find
Various combinations could also be scripted but I don't really see the
need, ie.
On May 13, 2014 7:13 PM, "François Bissey"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:52:03 William Stein wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:43 PM, François Bissey
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:30:26 William Stein wrote:
> > >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:23 PM, François Bissey
> > >>
> > >>
Dear me, the subject appeared a few times when other packages were
changed and on discussion of the git workflow but this one seems to be
the straw that broke the camel's back.
On 14/05/2014, at 22:54, Thierry wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:43:24PM +1200, François Bissey wrote:
> [...]
>
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:43:24PM +1200, François Bissey wrote:
[...]
> I know that the squashing of the changelog in the new style sage is
> unpopular in some quarters but I am sticking to the official line.
I am not sure a hole in the documentation can serve as "the official
line", could you
Feel free to write a patch if you care about it.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:52:03 AM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> I'm no big fan of the SPKG.txt changelog, which always seemed
> redundant to me. But if we're going to officially get rid of them,
> why not just get rid of all of them at once?
>
>
On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:52:03 William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:43 PM, François Bissey
>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:30:26 William Stein wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:23 PM, François Bissey
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > If someone is interested in
>
>
> > Is that intentional? For example, these lines get deleted forever:
> >
>
> Yes.
>
>
> > I've never been a huge fan of SPKG.txt being our change log, rather
> > than just the revision history. However, the fact is that SPKG.txt is
> > an important part of documenting the change hist
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:43 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:30:26 William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:23 PM, François Bissey
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > If someone is interested in getting numpy-1.8.1/scipy-0.14.0 in sage,
>> > they can review http://tra
On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:30:26 William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:23 PM, François Bissey
>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If someone is interested in getting numpy-1.8.1/scipy-0.14.0 in sage,
> > they can review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16299
>
> I glanced at it for a second an
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:23 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If someone is interested in getting numpy-1.8.1/scipy-0.14.0 in sage,
> they can review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16299
I glanced at it for a second and noticed that [1] completely deletes
the entire SPKG.txt change histo
Hi all,
If someone is interested in getting numpy-1.8.1/scipy-0.14.0 in sage,
they can review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16299
I usually review package upgrades but I cannot review myself obviously.
Francois
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sa
16 matches
Mail list logo
