Re: [sage-devel] SageMath Now Supports Meson – Faster and More Efficient Builds!

On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 6:54 AM 'tobia...@gmx.de' via sage-devel wrote: > > Thanks for your interest, William! > > The Meson project for Sage began in October 2023 (PR #36524), and most of the > work was wrapped up a couple of months ago. I just wanted to iron out a few > remaining annoyances bef

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath Now Supports Meson – Faster and More Efficient Builds!

Thanks for your interest, William! The Meson project for Sage began in October 2023 (PR #36524 ), and most of the work was wrapped up a couple of months ago. I just wanted to iron out a few remaining annoyances before officially announcing it on th

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath Now Supports Meson – Faster and More Efficient Builds!

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 7:51 AM William Stein wrote: > Congrats and fantastic! Is it possible that you could add some > additional "human context" for those of us on the sidelines, e.g., who > added Meson support to Sage (you?), why?, how hard what is and how > long did it take?, what was involv

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath Now Supports Meson – Faster and More Efficient Builds!

Tobias, Congrats and fantastic! Is it possible that you could add some additional "human context" for those of us on the sidelines, e.g., who added Meson support to Sage (you?), why?, how hard what is and how long did it take?, what was involved? Also, to what extent does Meson replace autotool

[sage-devel] SageMath Now Supports Meson – Faster and More Efficient Builds!

Dear developers, I am excited to announce that SageMath now supports the Meson build system! This modern alternative to Autotools brings several key advantages: - *Faster Builds* – Meson significantly reduces configuration and compilation time due to better parallelism (some benchmark

[sage-devel] SageMath is a GSoC 2025 Mentor Organization

Hi everyone, Thank you everyone who added a project idea. If you have already been a mentor, then please log in again and agree to the terms for 2025. If you have not been, then please send me an email (tcscrims {} gmail.com) with a Google-type email address so I can add you as a mentor. App

[sage-devel] SageMath embedding in C++ error

Hello. I am currently embedding SageMath within a C++ program. Executing it gives the expected output, but afterwards I get the following error: File "/home/username/Documents/my-module.py", line 1, in from sage.all import * File "/home/username/sage/src/sage/all.py", line 62, in from sage.

[sage-devel] SageMath 10.3 Qepcad crashed -- automatically restarting

### Steps To Reproduce 1. I installed Sage-Math 10.3 for my Mac M2 from [https://github.com/3-manifolds/Sage_macOS/releases/](link) 2. I tried running a program containing QEPCAD 3. Sage outputs `Qepcad crashed -- automatically restarting` 4. Previously asked about this, but the response was that

[sage-devel] sagemath-10.4 beta3

I can't build it any more : ubuntu 24.04 ryzen 9 9700x 24 threads It used to build to version beta 1 but since no way  ! I build it on manajaro I build it on wsl2 any help ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from t

[sage-devel] sagemath-10.4 beta3

Build with manjaro ryzen 9 9700x Very easy ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on

[sage-devel] SageMath version 10.4.beta1, Release Date: 2024-03-31

Hi, ubuntu 24.04 (+1) ryzen 9 7900x carte radeon, (12 cores 24 threads), build all done ok Best Henri -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+un

[sage-devel] SageMath GSoC 2024

Hi everyone, SageMath has been accepted this year as a mentor organization for Google's Summer of Code (GSoC) 2024! You can find information regarding our proposed projects and information on how to apply available on https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2024 There is still time if you want to pro

[sage-devel] SageMath app not found

I installed Sage 10.1 using the process detailed in the README. However, when I try to run a Python program that uses Sage, I get the message 'Could not find SageMath-10.1.app' and I get an error message that the import 'sage.all_cmdline' cannot be resolved. Are there any potential reasons this

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 10.1 for macOs ARM randomly fails to compute the Riemann/Ricci tensor or Ricci scalar when using threads

Thank you, Eric. Indeed, that’s the issue, and I’m happy to see some clever people are working on it. > El 3 oct 2023, a las 10:55, Eric Gourgoulhon > escribió: > > Hi, > > Le lundi 2 octobre 2023 à 13:42:29 UTC+2, Alejandro Marino Vaquero > Avilés-Casco a écrit : > When running sagemath re

[sage-devel] SageMath 10.1 for macOs ARM randomly fails to compute the Riemann/Ricci tensor or Ricci scalar when using threads

When running sagemath release version 10.1 in macOs for the arm architecture (the target tested has a M2 processor) with multiple threads, the calculation of the Riemann tensor, the Ricci tensor or the Ricci scalar normally fails, although sometimes it randomly success. Executing single thread

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath website in references

On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 9:09 AM 'Doris Behrendt' via sage-devel wrote: > > Hi list, > > if I wanted to cite the sagemath website and want to do it right, I > would have to add some kind of title and also an author; > > since there is no imprint on www.sagemath.org, > > what title and author would

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath website in references

Hello Doris, If this is relevant, then ways to cite SageMath (the software) are at https://wiki.sagemath.org/Publications_using_SageMath This link also appear, slightly hidden, on the main website in the Library->Publications page at https://www.sagemath.org/library-publications.html Maybe c

[sage-devel] sagemath website in references

Hi list, if I wanted to cite the sagemath website and want to do it right, I would have to add some kind of title and also an author; since there is no imprint on www.sagemath.org, what title and author would you suggest? Doris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 10.0.rc3

the last line means that the build of Maxima package failed (or no attempt to build it was made). On Tue, 16 May 2023, 08:04 Girard Henri, wrote: > Hi, > > It does work with ubuntu sagemath 9.5, but failed with compiled version, > any help ? > > best > > Henri > > Doing solve_tour.ipynb :solv

[sage-devel] sagemath 10.0.rc3

Hi, It does work with ubuntu sagemath 9.5, but failed with compiled version, any help ? best Henri Doing solve_tour.ipynb  :solve(x^2-x-1 == 0, x) --- RuntimeError Traceback (most recent ca

[sage-devel] SageMath is part of GSoC 2023!

Hi everyone, We were accepted as a mentor organization this year for Google's Summer of Code! For those who were not previously added as a mentor last year (and want to be this year), please email me or respond here. Best, Travis PS - Sorry for being slightly delayed on the announcement her

[sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4: Error building a wheel for scipy-1.9.2

Dear SageMath, scipy-1.92 was successfully built with the default configuration: ./configure SageMath was then built again with: ,/configure --prefix=/mnt/g/Maths/sage-9.8/b4.0 This new build failed at 'scipy-1.9.2'. Your help to debug and fix this issue is much appreciated. Please find 'no

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

Hi, > Can you remove ~/.sage/local/ ? This seems to fix the problem, SageMath 9.8 beta 4 has been successfully built. Thank you so much for your help. Best regards, phi On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:26:39 AM UTC-5 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:48 PM being nobod

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:48 PM being nobody00 wrote: > > > If you start ./sage -sh > > (sage-sh):b4.0$ pip --version > pip 22.0.2 from /home/hph/.sage/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pip > (python 3.10) this is wrong pip! (there should be no local/ in your ~/.sage/ at all) pip should be i

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

P.S: FWIW, from outside the (sage-sh) subshell , using system python3.10, pip (version 22.1.1) and wheel (version 0.34.2) ~/sage-9.8/b4/b4.0$ python3 -m pip wheel --help | grep config --config-settings KEY=VALUE. Use multiple --config-settings

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

> make wheel && make jupyter_jsmol It looks like 'wheel' is up to date (no changes in timestamps of log files): ~/sage-9.8/b4/b4.0$ ls -l logs/pkgs/*wheel* -rw-rw-rw- 1 hph hph 62807 Nov 23 18:30 logs/pkgs/setuptools_wheel-65.4.0.log -rw-rw-rw- 1 hph hph 18301 Nov 23 18:29 logs/pkgs/wheel-0.37.1.

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

> If you start ./sage -sh (sage-sh):b4.0$ pip --version pip 22.0.2 from /home/hph/.sage/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pip (python 3.10) (sage-sh):b4.0$ wheel version wheel 0.37.1 (sage-sh):b4.0$ python3 -m pip wheel --help | grep config environment variables and

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

It could be that at this point for some reason Sage's wheel package wasn't built yet. Can you run make wheel && make jupyter_jsmol On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 11:14:44 AM UTC Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:10 AM being nobody00 > wrote: > > > > Dear SageMath, > > > > S

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:10 AM being nobody00 wrote: > > Dear SageMath, > > SageMath 9.8 beta 4 failed to build on this system: > > $ uname -a > Linux 4.4.0-17763-Microsoft #2268-Microsoft Thu Oct 07 16:36:00 PST 2021 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > $ which python3 > /usr/bin/python3 > $ pyth

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

Sorry, that's all there is in here: ~/sage-9.8/b4/b4.0$ ls -l logs/pkgs/*jmol* -rw-rw-rw- 1 hph hph 2856 Nov 23 18:05 logs/pkgs/jmol-14.29.52.log ~/sage-9.8/b4/b4.0$ ls -l logs/pkgs/*wheel* -rw-rw-rw- 1 hph hph 62807 Nov 23 18:30 logs/pkgs/setuptools_wheel-65.4.0.log -rw-rw-rw- 1 hph hph 18301 N

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:49 AM being nobody00 wrote: > > Hi, > > > please post the latest logs/pkgs/jmol-*.log here. > Please find attached 'jmol-14.29.52.log.7z' Sorry, I meant all logs/pkgs/*jmol-*.log - it's not jmol's bug, most likely, but the wheel building of the corresponding python pac

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

Hi, > please post the latest logs/pkgs/jmol-*.log here. Please find attached 'jmol-14.29.52.log.7z' Best regards, phi On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 3:30:07 AM UTC-5 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:10 AM being nobody00 > wrote: > > > > Dear SageMath, > > > > SageMath 9

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:10 AM being nobody00 wrote: > > Dear SageMath, > > SageMath 9.8 beta 4 failed to build on this system: > > $ uname -a > Linux 4.4.0-17763-Microsoft #2268-Microsoft Thu Oct 07 16:36:00 PST 2021 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > $ which python3 > /usr/bin/python3 > $ pyth

[sage-devel] SageMath 9.8 beta 4 build questions

Dear SageMath, SageMath 9.8 beta 4 failed to build on this system: $ uname -a Linux 4.4.0-17763-Microsoft #2268-Microsoft Thu Oct 07 16:36:00 PST 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ which python3 /usr/bin/python3 $ python3 --version Python 3.10.8 $ ~/sage-9.8/b4/b4.0/local/var/lib/sage/venv-py

[sage-devel] SageMath 9.8.b3 - Error building Sage. package: jupyter_jsmol-2022.1.0

Dear All, Please find 'config.log' and 'jupyter_jsmol-2022.1.0.log' in the attached 'report.b3.7z' Your help is much appreciated. Best regards, phi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiv

[sage-devel] SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

Hey all, I really liked the way of making code accessible via a repository or gist containing a bunch of notebooks together with a simple Dockerfile that has not much more than "FROM sagemath/sagemath:version" in it -- but this is something that broke down a while ago (https://github.com/sagem

[sage-devel] SageMath 9.7.beta3: hecke_series takes forever

I am not sure if I should open a ticket or add to a ticket. This is on SageMath 9.7.beta3 built from source on Apple Silicon (both macOS 11.6.7 and macOS 12.4). This test, taken from src/sage/modular/overconvergent/hecke_series.py takes forever: sage: hecke_series(*5*, *7*, *1*, *5*, modform

[sage-devel] SageMath and VScode

Dear All, There was a related discussion here: https://ask.sagemath.org/question/43240/sagemath-and-vscode/ Is there any way to debug SageMath using VScode client on Windows and server on "remote WSL" (on the same machine)? Your advice is much appreciated. Regards, phiho -- You received t

[sage-devel] SageMath Accepted as GSoC 2022 Mentor Organization

Hi everyone, Great news. SageMath has been accepted this year as a mentor organization. I will start the preparations for the next stages. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop re

[sage-devel] Sagemath in The Calabi-Yau Landscape

Dear List, Sagemath occupies a whole section (Appendix E) in "The Calabi-Yau Landscape: from Geometry, to Physics, to Machine-Learning" by Yang-Hui He: https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02893 Does Sagemath Sagemanifolds have any tutorial on this kind of manifolds? Any pointer is much appreciated. Re

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33153 for this. On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 9:20:55 AM UTC-8 bae...@gmail.com wrote: > Indeed, adding the flag > export CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -Wno-error=return-type" > fixed the problem. Never had to do this in the past though. > > Thanks a lot fo

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

Indeed, adding the flag export CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -Wno-error=return-type" fixed the problem. Never had to do this in the past though. Thanks a lot for the help! Michael Orlitzky schrieb am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2022 um 14:18:20 UTC+1: > On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 10:19 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

See https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/81unMG60MyU/m/iDXLIDc0EAAJ - this comes in through the sysconfig of opensuse's python3. This should be reported as a bug to opensuse. On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 5:48:04 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:35 PM Michael

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:35 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 13:27 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > to see if it can be overridden. But it would be nice to track down the > > > source of the -Werror so that it can be fixed for others. > > > > I have found it - it's absense o

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 13:27 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > to see if it can be overridden. But it would be nice to track down the > > source of the -Werror so that it can be fixed for others. > > I have found it - it's absense of return statement in an inline > function in an fflas-ffpack header

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:18 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 10:19 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > Basically, your C++ compiler is too strict. > > I think it's just the CFLAGS that are too strict: > > error: Command "gcc-10 -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG >

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 10:19 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Basically, your C++ compiler is too strict. I think it's just the CFLAGS that are too strict: error: Command "gcc-10 -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -funwind-table

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:18 AM Christian Bär wrote: > > On recent opensuse tumbleweed 20220109 sagemath 9.5rc0 still does not > compile. Tested on different hardware configurations. > > The install.log and all package log files which contain an error can be found > here: https://baernextcloud.m

[sage-devel] sagemath 9.5rc0 still not compiling on opensuse tumbleweed

On recent opensuse tumbleweed 20220109 sagemath 9.5rc0 still does not compile. Tested on different hardware configurations. The install.log and all package log files which contain an error can be found here: https://baernextcloud.math.uni-potsdam.de/index.php/s/ofG2zfYXR3fkrLz It looks like a

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5beta9 fails to compile on opensuse tumbleweed

On Tuesday, December 28, 2021 at 5:32:51 AM UTC-8 Florian Hanisch wrote: > There was one interruption (sage-maxima.lisp not found while building the > docs). After adding the file to > /sage-9.5.beta9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.8/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/sage/interfaces > > and rest

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5beta9 fails to compile on opensuse tumbleweed

These flags likely come in through the sysconfig of the system python. Check "python3 -m sysconfig | grep CFLAGS" On Monday, December 27, 2021 at 5:01:38 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Your compiler settings are stricter that usual. > > Try > > CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -Wno-error=return-type" CFLAG

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5beta9 fails to compile on opensuse tumbleweed

Your compiler settings are stricter that usual. Try CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -Wno-error=return-type" CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -Wno-error=return-type" make build On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 12:41 PM 'Florian Hanisch' via sage-devel wrote: > > > probably the error is in building sagelib. > > Look in logs/pkgs/sagel

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5beta9 fails to compile on opensuse tumbleweed

> probably the error is in building sagelib. > Look in logs/pkgs/sagelib-9.5.beta9.log Thanks a lot, this log file indeed ends on an error message (still have to figure out what exactly went wrong here): error: Command "gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURC

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 9.5beta9 fails to compile on opensuse tumbleweed

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:41 AM 'Florian Hanisch' via sage-devel wrote: > > Hi, > > I have tried to compile sagemath 9.5beta9 on opensuse tumbleweed (running on > a DELL XPS 15, core i7, 16G RAM) but failed. I have been running > > ./configure --without-system-givaro > MAKE='make -j6' make > > W

[sage-devel] SageMath and xrdp - Environment Variable error

When launching QTerminal in an xrdp session in Lubuntu, running 'sage' gives the following error /bin/sage: line 242: /bin/sage-env: No such file or directory Error setting environment variables by sourcing '/bin/sage-env'; possibly contact sage-devel (see http://groups.google.com/group/sage-deve

[sage-devel] SageMath Anaconda and Python 3.8

My Anaconda is instaled with Python 3.8. I tried to attach Sage to Anaconda by running one of the commands listed here https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/sage However, there is python incompatibility. Is there any plan for an upgrade? The message on a terminal window is UnsatisfiableError: The f

[sage-devel] sagemath 9.0 for MacOS is not linked with SSL

(sage-sh) junwei@jwang-imac:~/git/tool_whitebox-engine/web_service/services/api$ which pip /Applications/SageMath-9.0.app/Contents/Resources/sage/local/bin/pip (sage-sh) junwei@jwang-imac:~/git/tool_whitebox-engine/web_service/services/api$ pip install tqdm pip is configured with locations that

[sage-devel] SageMath part of GSoC 2020

SageMath was selected to be part of Google Summer of Code 2020. wiki: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2020 gsoc: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/4553430409936896/ timeline: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/#timeline (next important date: students apply mid March

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

Yes, sage on conda-forge supports python 2.7, 3.6 and 3.7 on linux (glibc x86_64) and osx-64. Isuru On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:07 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > It's hit and miss for Sage to build on Catalina, I think the latest > Xcode cannot not build it. > Otherwise there is an option to use Con

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

It's hit and miss for Sage to build on Catalina, I think the latest Xcode cannot not build it. Otherwise there is an option to use Conda, which allows you to select Python3, as far as I know (Isuru will correct me if I'm wrong...) On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 4:07 PM Junwei Wang wrote: > > Besides, co

[sage-devel] sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

Besides, could the SAGE team officially release binary with Python 3 (although it is not stable), since we are force to use python3 in many cases and it is painful to compile by user themselves? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

[sage-devel] SageMath for Windows download counts via GitHub

Something that has vexed me since first posting Windows releases to GitHub is that I would have liked to have at least *some* download statistics for it, and yet GitHub doesn't display that anywhere on the website. However, I was just noodling around in the GitHub API (trying to automate releases)

[sage-devel] SageMath users in the UK?

Hi all, if you are a SageMath developer or user and based at a university or institution in the UK we are interested in hearing from you. Especially if you are interested in joining a group of us trying to get EPSRC funding for Sage-related activities. Together with Chris Wutrich and some oth

[sage-devel] SageMath 8.8 with Jupyter shows 404 errors in terminal log

Since converting all my old noteboks over to Jupyter, and making pretty printing my default, I have seen 404 errors in the console log. These look something like: > 404 GET > /nbextensions/mathjax/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax_AMS-Regular.otf > (127.0.0.1) 2.94ms > referer=http://localhost:

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath Conway polynomials error from Conda Forge

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:16 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:06 PM Steven Craighead > wrote: > > > > I have tried to build SageMath from Conda Forge multiple times and it > > continually fails out due to the fact that the Conway polynomial package is > > too old. > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath Conway polynomials error from Conda Forge

Thanks. I was having other issues with building the regular way and went to Conda. I’ll try again and document better. Sent from my iPad > On Mar 10, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:06 PM Steven Craighead > wrote: >> >> I have tried to build SageMath

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath Conway polynomials error from Conda Forge

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:06 PM Steven Craighead wrote: > > I have tried to build SageMath from Conda Forge multiple times and it > continually fails out due to the fact that the Conway polynomial package is > too old. > > Who on sage development works with updating Conda Forge. Nobody really

[sage-devel] Sagemath Conway polynomials error from Conda Forge

I have tried to build SageMath from Conda Forge multiple times and it continually fails out due to the fact that the Conway polynomial package is too old. Who on sage development works with updating Conda Forge. I’m running the latest miniconda3 on an older Mac laptop with a current MacOS. S

[sage-devel] sagemath 8.3 rc0

Hi, I couldn't compile previous version, always some errors. But this rc0 passed without any problems ! ubuntu xenial AMD 64 8 x 16 Go RAM. Regards Henri -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop r

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath devel branch fails to build on Linux Mint 19; ntl, setuptools, ecl and givaro build failure

Regardless it's clear from the screenshot that this is just https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25731 On Fri, Jul 6, 2018, 13:55 BJH2017 wrote: > Sorry, here be the logs, didn't realize I could attach them. > > On Friday, 6 July 2018 21:49:35 UTC+10, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2018-07-06 13:43

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath devel branch fails to build on Linux Mint 19; ntl, setuptools, ecl and givaro build failure

On 2018-07-06 13:43, BJH2017 wrote: Have you tried clicking "Raw"? it should show you the full log. Yes

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath devel branch fails to build on Linux Mint 19; ntl, setuptools, ecl and givaro build failure

Have you tried clicking "Raw"? it should show you the full log. On Friday, 6 July 2018 21:34:28 UTC+10,

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath devel branch fails to build on Linux Mint 19; ntl, setuptools, ecl and givaro build failure

On 2018-07-06 01:33, BJH2017 wrote: The logs for these dependencies are in this gist: https://gist.github.com/fusion809/cd1b666ce7530bfa376f2397ca5a498a. They seem to be truncated, hence useless. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.

[sage-devel] SageMath devel branch fails to build on Linux Mint 19; ntl, setuptools, ecl and givaro build failure

Hi, This error I'm confident has nothing to do with my environment variables as I build SageMath, or tried to, from a clean bash shell with a very simple ~/.bashrc (which just cd's to sage's git repo and runs make -j9, no environment variables set in it explicitly). The error is shown in this

[sage-devel] SageMath 8.2 Docker image: pip lacks SSL support

Just tried out the latest Sage Docker image and, unlike all previous versions, I can no longer use pip to fetch packages off PyPI: docker run -it sagemath/sagemath:8.2 /bin/bash sage@6bf664a266cd:~/sage$ sage -pip install FXrays pip is configured with locations that require TLS/SSL, however the s

[sage-devel] sagemath problems

Hello, processing of ticket actions is quite slow and zulip.sagemath.org gives a 502, both since at least yesterday. Can someone please have a look? Regards, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sage-devel] "SageMath will replace Maple"

One tiny step toward our mission statement... -- Forwarded message -- From: Jori Mäntysalo Date: Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:29 AM Subject: Sage and supercomputer Might be of interest to know. Taito is the second biggest computer in Finland, 17704 computing cores in total. -- Jori Mä

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:32 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote: >> >> During the >> [discussion](https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/fE45025Wphs/mKdCAeNhAgAJ) >> of the inclusion of OpenSSL, a few remarks were mafdeabout the security

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

There are various downloads that we need to consider: (A) Downloads of Sage-the-distribution source/binary tarballs (B) Cloning the git repo (C) Downloading tarballs while building from the git repo I think that (A) should be our primary worry, since those are usually not checked by anybody. Fo

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

Serving over https is very easy nowadays, thanks to letsencrypt. Nonetheless, it may take some time for all mirrors to switch to it. Switching to sha-256 hashes is a much more trivial change, which can be rolled out almost overnight. In the same vein, on the download page only md5 hashes are list

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

On 10/25/2017 04:29 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > Ouch ! The security proble so well explained by William turns out to be > a much larger "social" problem... > > Worth atacking ? > Not really... you can get commit access to sage.git by asking nicely. Ultimately, HTTPS is pointless unless yo

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:29 PM Emmanuel Charpentier < emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ouch ! The security proble so well explained by William turns out to be a > much larger "social" problem... > > > Worth attacking ? > I think it's better to think of computer security as being about a

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

Ouch ! The security proble so well explained by William turns out to be a much larger "social" problem... Worth atacking ? -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le mercredi 25 octobre 2017 21:45:37 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > Pretty much anybody can host a download mirror by sending Harald an email, >

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

Pretty much anybody can host a download mirror by sending Harald an email, so requiring https to download files doesn't mean much. On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 at 6:32:26 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM Emmanuel Charpentier < > emanuel.c...@gmail.com > wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM Emmanuel Charpentier < emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote: > During the [discussion]( > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/fE45025Wphs/mKdCAeNhAgAJ) of > the inclusion of OpenSSL, a few remarks were mafdeabout the security of our > distribution infrastruct

Re: [sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > During the > [discussion](https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/fE45025Wphs/mKdCAeNhAgAJ) > of the inclusion of OpenSSL, a few remarks were mafdeabout the security of > our distribution infrastructure. > > > It has been noted that

[sage-devel] Sagemath mirrors security issues

During the [discussion](https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/fE45025Wphs/mKdCAeNhAgAJ) of the inclusion of OpenSSL, a few remarks were mafdeabout the security of our distribution infrastructure. It has been noted that http is ridiculously easy to hijack

[sage-devel] SageMath-7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/interfaces/psage.py

Hi, I posted a problem on ask.sagemath.org a few weeks ago, https://ask.sagemath.org/question/35698/parallel-interface-to-the-sage-interpreter-20/ but didn't get any reply. I believe I thoroughly documented a potential bug in psage.py but my python knowledge for system programming is limited an

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath ArraryFire and afnumpy

Hello, Just for information. A lot of efforts are currently done to have Sage more system friendly. In particular - on gentoo distribution https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo - on debian distribution (experimental) https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage I think this is the only viabl

[sage-devel] SageMath ArraryFire and afnumpy

SageMath is a computer algebra system http://www.sagemath.org/ that provides an interface to a large number of open source packages for both symbolic and numeric computations, including especially numpy. But unlike a lot of open source SageMath bundles most of these software packages in a sing

Re: [sage-devel] SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

What’s more annoying, is that it should be ok to fail here as ntl is trying to establish if -march=native is a valid flag. François > On 6/06/2016, at 13:47, Nathan Dunfield wrote: > > On OS X versions 10.8 (Mountain Lion) and 10.9 (Mavricks), the recently > updated NTL package fails to build

[sage-devel] SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

On OS X versions 10.8 (Mountain Lion) and 10.9 (Mavricks), the recently updated NTL package fails to build with the following error (complete log also attached). g++ -I../include -I. -march=native -O2 -g -fno-common -c MakeDescAux.c /var/folders/54/dhk_ryyx21x9xgj4mm_gn89cgn/T//cc2w7pb7.s:

[sage-devel] SageMath for Windows installer

Hi all, I've been working for a few weeks on an installer for Sage on Windows, which takes advantage of Docker to accomplish this.* The goal of this project is to make it possible to run Sage on Windows with as much transparency as possible, such that the user isn't really aware that there is any

[sage-devel] SageMath has been accepted as an GSoC 2016 mentor org

Hi, just a quick note to everyone: SageMath has yet again been accepted as a mentoring organization for this years GSoC More info on their new website here: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com Next step: everyone who is interested to be a mentor, or at least help us dealing with applications, etc

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath developer manual

Le lundi 18 janvier 2016 10:18:54 UTC, Harald Schilly a écrit : > > the hosting is on github, and if a subdirectory matches a project, > it's a "sub-page" > > So, the second link is pointing here: > https://github.com/sagemath/git-developer-guide > > I don't know anything about this repositor

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath developer manual

the hosting is on github, and if a subdirectory matches a project, it's a "sub-page" So, the second link is pointing here: https://github.com/sagemath/git-developer-guide I don't know anything about this repository. > Harald, I actually don't know where doc.sagemath is coming from, can you > ha

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath developer manual

> Harald, I actually don't know where doc.sagemath is coming > from It is our "new doc index" since the last hosting changes. What used to be the index is not used anymore as far as I know. http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/website/ Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscr

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath developer manual

I vaguely remember copying it there during the git transition for testing, please remove. Harald, I actually don't know where doc.sagemath is coming from, can you handle it? On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 8:47:05 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-01-18 09:19, Samuel Lelièvre wrote: > >

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath developer manual

On 2016-01-18 09:19, Samuel Lelièvre wrote: http://www.sagemath.org/git-developer-guide/trac.html This looks like an oudated version of the real developer guide. Not sure what it's doing there. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" grou

[sage-devel] sagemath developer manual

Hi all, anyone know why these two documents are online: http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/trac.html http://www.sagemath.org/git-developer-guide/trac.html and whether one is an old version of the other? Best, Samuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

  1   2   >