On Sun, 15 May 2011 20:51:54 +1200
Francois Bissey wrote:
> On the other hand singular seems to be getting a python interface it
> may be an idea to investigate switching to that.
This interface allows calling python from the Singular interpreter,
which gives access to PolyBoRi for example. Modu
On 2011-05-15 16:15, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> Le 15/05/2011 14:13, Julien PUYDT a écrit :
>> I'm still using latest stable :-)
>
> Well, I *was* still using it : I decided to check if it was still
> compiling correctly too, so I removed it and gave it a try : it doesn't
> compile anymore :-)
>
> (no
Le 15/05/2011 14:13, Julien PUYDT a écrit :
I'm still using latest stable :-)
Well, I *was* still using it : I decided to check if it was still
compiling correctly too, so I removed it and gave it a try : it doesn't
compile anymore :-)
(not a big problem -- I wouldn't have tried that if I h
Le 15/05/2011 13:45, Volker Braun a écrit :
You are right, once again we see why LD_LIBRARY_PATH should not be set.
I posted a workaround in
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/hLL02U1Q5zU/discussion
Good to know, but I'm not interested in a workaround : I just wanted to
give feedbac
You are right, once again we see why LD_LIBRARY_PATH should not be set. I
posted a workaround in
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/hLL02U1Q5zU/discussion
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-dev
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
I gave it a
> On 05/15/11 08:47 AM, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> > Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
> >> At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
> >> would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
> >> whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I w
On 05/15/11 08:47 AM, Julien PUYDT wrote:
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
sage-4.7rc2 s
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
sage-4.7rc2 s
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
> would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
> whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
> in abou
Hello all,
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
Jeroen.
--
To post to this group, send an email
12 matches
Mail list logo
