On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:30 PM, MartinX wrote:
> I am slightly puzzled. Trac #1173, #13050 and #13003 all aim to improve
> numerical calculation of erf() and are still open. In the meantime, at
> least as far as 5.2 is concerned, it appears that erf() has been updated too
> be consistent with t
I am slightly puzzled. Trac #1173, #13050 and #13003 all aim to improve
numerical calculation of erf() and are still open. In the meantime, at
least as far as 5.2 is concerned, it appears that erf() has been updated
too be consistent with the template developed in #11143 and now uses mpmath
a
