On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:30 PM, MartinX <mar...@questors.plus.com> wrote: > I am slightly puzzled. Trac #1173, #13050 and #13003 all aim to improve > numerical calculation of erf() and are still open. In the meantime, at > least as far as 5.2 is concerned, it appears that erf() has been updated too > be consistent with the template developed in #11143 and now uses mpmath and > deals with complex numbers for numerical calculation. Should we now close > the open tracs? Or am I missing the point? > > Martin >
I think #13003 can be closed; it is marked "Reported upstream. Developers deny it's a bug." and the original reason for the ticket has been solved in the meantime by #13193 (see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13193#comment:6). On the other hand, #1173, and #13050 are still around to address a different enhancement: allowing the user to pass an `algorithm` parameter to change the backend used for numerical evaluation. This latter enhancement depends on modifications to Pynac, see #12289. -- Benjamin Jones -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
