On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 1:19:45 PM UTC-7, Snark wrote:
>
> Le 11/03/2015 17:53, William Stein a écrit :
> >1. Setup/write an editorial notification system to encourage the
> > reviewing of tickets, similar to how every journal on the planet has
> > an automated system for ensuring
On 2015-03-11 17:44, Julien Puydt wrote:
What should be really done with long-waiting needs_review tickets ?
Where should the time limit be between "It's just taking long" and "It's
outdated" ?
I think the truly outdated tickets are a minority.
Tickets which need review since a long time are n
Le 11/03/2015 17:53, William Stein a écrit :
1. Setup/write an editorial notification system to encourage the
reviewing of tickets, similar to how every journal on the planet has
an automated system for ensuring papers get reviewed, seeing the
status of outstanding papers, etc. Maybe we coul
>
> 1. Setup/write an editorial notification system to encourage the
> reviewing of tickets, similar to how every journal on the planet has
> an automated system for ensuring papers get reviewed, seeing the
> status of outstanding papers, etc. Maybe we could even just use an
> existing
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking it would be interesting to have a look at the tickets needing
> review, so I browsed the list... and saw one of them was waiting since about
> three years (sic). I put it to needs_info because obviously everything in it
Hi,
I was thinking it would be interesting to have a look at the tickets
needing review, so I browsed the list... and saw one of them was waiting
since about three years (sic). I put it to needs_info because obviously
everything in it is so clearly outdated. But then there are also many
who a
