On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:56 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 8:50 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> On 20-Jan-08, at 9:18 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say
>
> I am not to big a fan of this since I ke
On Jan 20, 8:50 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Alexander wrote:
Hi,
> > On 20-Jan-08, at 9:18 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> >> Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say
I am not to big a fan of this since I keep all my open source patches
in another place and I do pre
Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> On 20-Jan-08, at 9:18 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say
>
> I think so. I always attach my name, because I find it helps me keep
> track of what I have been involved in and helps attribute patches.
>
You can always a
On 20-Jan-08, at 9:18 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see a lot of variation in naming:
>
> 1746.patch
> 1653.hg
> trac-1855.patch
> trac_1715.patch
> trac_1485_matrix-group_reverse_.patch
>
> Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say
I think so. I always attach my name, bec
