On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:56 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > On Jan 20, 8:50 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Nick Alexander wrote: > > Hi, > >>> On 20-Jan-08, at 9:18 AM, Jaap Spies wrote: >>>> Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say > > I am not to big a fan of this since I keep all my open source patches > in another place and I do prefix them with the project and release > number. I am also a big fan of a descriptive patch name versus trac- > XXXX.patch because remembering the issue is much simpler than the trac > number. And I assume that I am actually the person who does remember > most trac tickets by content ;)
I totally agree with this. My convention is XXXX-brief-identifier.patch. This makes it easy to see all patches relevant to a particular ticket, but at the same time remember what the ticket is about. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
