Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage binaries useless for development

2015-05-27 Thread Volker Braun
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 11:42:59 AM UTC+2, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Apart from the "local" folder to I actually need anything else here to run > sage? > The documentation output is unfortunately still under /src/doc/output. Patches would be welcome! -- You received this message because

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage binaries useless for development

2015-05-27 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi I have to make some decisions for the PPA as well. Here the install is 1) root-owned 2) I just removed .git and .gitignore from the PPA for dpkg-specific reasons (a quilt package fails to build and a native package fails if .git is included). Doing git stuff as root in a /usr/ filesystem over f

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage binaries useless for development

2015-05-26 Thread William Stein
Hi, I've decided to not worry about this sad loss of functionality. Instead, for SageMathCloud at least, I'm just going to write a new "bdist" that will start over by doing (1) tar'ing up a clean Sage build. I may then add (2) reducing the size a little, if there is anything obvious, which doesn'

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage binaries useless for development

2015-05-25 Thread William Stein
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Monday, 25 May 2015 20:17:49 UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just curious -- is this intentional? >> >> 1. Build sage. >> 2. Type "./sage -bdist ..." >> 3. Extract the resulting tarball elsewhere >> 4. Type "make" inside the ex

[sage-devel] Re: sage binaries useless for development

2015-05-25 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, 25 May 2015 20:17:49 UTC+1, William wrote: > > Hi, > > Just curious -- is this intentional? > > 1. Build sage. > 2. Type "./sage -bdist ..." > 3. Extract the resulting tarball elsewhere > 4. Type "make" inside the extracted directory. BOOM! Total disaster. > Has it ever worked