On Oct 21, 8:42 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Did you run "make test"? I'm curious if everything works.
yes, one error:
File "/usr/local/sage/4.1.2/devel/sage/sage/modules/
vector_double_dense.pyx", line 663:
sage: v.stats_kurtosis()
Expected:
-1.23
Got:
doctest:106: SyntaxWarning: a
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> I dropped the file into $sageroot/local/lib, made the symbolic link
> ln -s libstdc++.so.6.0.12 libstdc++.so.6
> and ran sage in my by now weird hybrid binary install with a few spkgs
> compiled from source and, surprisingly,
> NO ERRORS! So
I dropped the file into $sageroot/local/lib, made the symbolic link
ln -s libstdc++.so.6.0.12 libstdc++.so.6
and ran sage in my by now weird hybrid binary install with a few spkgs
compiled from source and, surprisingly,
NO ERRORS! So apparently, the locally compiled files run quite happily
with th
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 10:08 am, William Stein wrote:
>
>> Would you be willing to test taking a fresh install of the fedora 11
>> binary and dropping
>> libstdc++ from Fedora 11 (etc.) into your local/bin/?
>
> $sage_root/local/lib I presume.
Yes.
>
On Oct 21, 10:08 am, William Stein wrote:
> Would you be willing to test taking a fresh install of the fedora 11
> binary and dropping
> libstdc++ from Fedora 11 (etc.) into your local/bin/?
$sage_root/local/lib I presume.
Sure. Can I get the appropriate libstdc++ from somewhere? Is there an
i
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:08 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> Just a datapoint that might provide useful feedback for those who are
>> trying to make binary installs a smooth experience:
>>
>> I tried to install 4.1.2 on a Fedora 10 (i686) lapt
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> Just a datapoint that might provide useful feedback for those who are
> trying to make binary installs a smooth experience:
>
> I tried to install 4.1.2 on a Fedora 10 (i686) laptop. I tried both
> the Fedora 9 and the Fedora 11 image. With e
Just a datapoint that might provide useful feedback for those who are
trying to make binary installs a smooth experience:
I tried to install 4.1.2 on a Fedora 10 (i686) laptop. I tried both
the Fedora 9 and the Fedora 11 image. With either I got errors:
ImportError: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: vers
On Oct 20, 10:30 pm, "Georg S. Weber"
wrote:
> @Harald, Minh, William:
> Could you upload Marshall's binary to the usual download place?
yes, i'll do it. Next time please email me directly ... so that i
don't miss it ;)
H
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this gro
Hi,
I also just tested the official MacPPC OS X 10.4 Sage 4.1.2 binary and
it did *not* work for me, the final blocker being "(libgmp) ...
incompatible cpu-subtype". Obviously, this binary was built on a Mac
with a PowerPC G5, but from at least one sage-support thread (I do not
remember exactly)
On 20 Okt., 16:36, mhampton wrote:
> OK, I put up a gzip'd dmg at:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/sage-4.1.2-OSX-Intel-10...
>
> I don't usually make binaries, hopefully that works for you.
>
> -Marshall
>
Hi Marshall,
usually it's me to build the OS X 10.4 Sage binaries, but
OK, I put up a gzip'd dmg at:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/sage-4.1.2-OSX-Intel-10.4.11-i386-Darwin.dmg.gz
I don't usually make binaries, hopefully that works for you.
-Marshall
On Oct 20, 7:45 am, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I have neve
Hi Marshall,
Thanks for the feedback. I have never managed to do a sage -upgrade
without problems on my machine, but this is the first time that
compiling from source does not work, either. In the mean time, I tried
to compile it again within the same directory where I extracted the tar
into
I have sage-4.1.2 running on OS 10.4.11, on a first generation Mac
Pro. But I think I upgraded. I could try a fresh install on that
machine later today. I can also generate a binary if William doesn't
have access to such a machine.
-Marshall
On Oct 20, 1:45 am, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Dear
Dear William,
I tried to compile from source on my Macbook Pro with OSX 10.4.11 but
got the following failure:
make[5]: *** [gnutls_buffers.lo] Killed
make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
failed to build GNUTLS
real1m37.444s
u
On Oct 15, 8:11 am, William Stein wrote:
> I. SAGE-4.1.2: Sage-4.1.2 has been released.
I just want to add that some mirrors are already synced. Please use
them!
> 3. Experts: you can upgrade with "sage -upgrade".
That's not so good, since it uses the webserver. Please do
sage -upgrade ht
On Oct 15, 2:11 am, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I. SAGE-4.1.2: Sage-4.1.2 has been released.
>
> 1. You can download the source code here:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/src/sage-4.1.2.tar
> 2. I've posted many binaries here:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/h
17 matches
Mail list logo
