On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote: > > I dropped the file into $sageroot/local/lib, made the symbolic link > ln -s libstdc++.so.6.0.12 libstdc++.so.6 > and ran sage in my by now weird hybrid binary install with a few spkgs > compiled from source and, surprisingly, > NO ERRORS! So apparently, the locally compiled files run quite happily > with the newly provided libstdc++, but not the other way around. > Incidentally, fedora 10 has libstdc++.so.6.0.10. >
Did you run "make test"? I'm curious if everything works. William > I don't understand why the fedora 9 binary didn't work. The libstdc++ > for that can't have been more recent than the standard one for F10, > right? > > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---