On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> I dropped the file into $sageroot/local/lib, made the symbolic link
> ln -s libstdc++.so.6.0.12 libstdc++.so.6
> and ran sage in my by now weird hybrid binary install with a few spkgs
> compiled from source and, surprisingly,
> NO ERRORS! So apparently, the locally compiled files run quite happily
> with the newly provided libstdc++, but not the other way around.
> Incidentally, fedora 10 has libstdc++.so.6.0.10.
>

Did you run "make test"?   I'm curious if everything works.

William

> I don't understand why the fedora 9 binary didn't work. The libstdc++
> for that can't have been more recent than the standard one for F10,
> right?
>
> >
>



-- 
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to