> > Well, could you just for fun rebuild pari? I think the compiler should
> > blow up in that case, too, and I am curious why pari's build system
> > doesn't catch it.
>
> The command
> sage -f pari-2.3.2.p3
> worked fine on the suse machine.
The problem isn't with building pari but with some n
On 10/16/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -fPIC -I/home/wdj/sagefiles/sage-2.8.7/local//include
> -I/home/wdj/sagefiles/sage-2.8.7/local//include/csage
> -I/home/wdj/sagefiles/sage-2.8.7/devel//sage/sage/ext
> -I/home/wdj/sagefiles/s
On 10/16/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 16, 6:09 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/16/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Hi David,
>
>
>
> > > gcc blows up, there is little we can do about that. Please check if
> > > there are updates com
Sage-2.8.5 compiled fine on SUSE, so this problem only occurs with a
very recent version of gen.pyx. I recently modified the factor
function in gen.pyx so that it would do provably-correct factorization
of integers. Since that's the function causing the compiler error,
probably something I did cau
On Oct 16, 6:09 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi David,
> > gcc blows up, there is little we can do about that. Please check if
> > there are updates compilers available for SuSE 10.2. If not you can
> > either install your
On 10/16/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 16, 5:46 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/16/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 16, 4:26 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> >
>
> Hi David,
>
> > >
On Oct 16, 5:46 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 16, 4:26 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
>
Hi David,
> > > This version does not upgrade or install on suse 9.1 amd64.
>
> > As far as
On 10/16/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 16, 4:26 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> > This version does not upgrade or install on suse 9.1 amd64.
>
> As far as I can tell Suse 9.1 AMD64 ships with gcc 3.3, which is not
> C99 conform. So flint wo
On Oct 16, 4:26 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> This version does not upgrade or install on suse 9.1 amd64.
As far as I can tell Suse 9.1 AMD64 ships with gcc 3.3, which is not
C99 conform. So flint won't build, you need at least gcc 3.4 or
higher.
>
> I would not m
This version does not upgrade or install on suse 9.1 amd64.
I would not make it a priority since these machines are due to be upgraded,
but thought I'd let you know.
However, it does not install on suse 10.2 either!
In case this helps:
sage: An error occurred while installing flint-0.2.p4
Plea
On sage.math, I tried to run the public version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.8.7, Release Date: 2007-10-15 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
-
William Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have released sage-2.8.7.rc1 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
>
> In particular, this link:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/sage-2.8.7.rc1.tar
>
> Hopefully this will work with no doctest failures on some systems.
> Let me know
On 10/15/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've posted rc2, which resolved a few remaining
> issues (a major bug in Cython and issues I had
> with two of the patches that fixed things):
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/sage-2.8.7.rc2.tar
>
> Also, it would be great if
Hi,
I've posted rc2, which resolved a few remaining
issues (a major bug in Cython and issues I had
with two of the patches that fixed things):
http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/sage-2.8.7.rc2.tar
Also, it would be great if somebody with SUSE could
test the build. I had a major problem buildi
All test passed on Gentoo x86 linux
(gcc-4.1.2)
On 10/15/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2007, at 6:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have released sage-2.8.7.rc1 here:
> >
> >http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
> >
> > In particular, th
On Oct 14, 2007, at 6:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have released sage-2.8.7.rc1 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
>
> In particular, this link:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/sage-2.8.7.rc1.tar
>
> Hopefully this will work with no doctest failures on
On 10/14/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have released sage-2.8.7.rc1 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
>
> In particular, this link:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/sage-2.8.7.rc1.tar
>
> Hopefully this will work with no doctest failures o
All tests pass on my machine as well.
David
On 10/14/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/07, mabshoff > On Oct 14, 3:56 pm, "William Stein"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have released sage-2.8.7.rc1 here:
> > >
> > >http://sage.math.washington.
On 10/14/07, mabshoff > On Oct 14, 3:56 pm, "William Stein"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have released sage-2.8.7.rc1 here:
> >
> >http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
> >
> > In particular, this link:
> >
> >http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/sage-2.8.7.rc1.tar
> >
> >
On Oct 14, 3:56 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have released sage-2.8.7.rc1 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
>
> In particular, this link:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/sage-2.8.7.rc1.tar
>
> Hopefully this will work with no doctest fa
Hello,
I have released sage-2.8.7.rc1 here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
In particular, this link:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/sage-2.8.7.rc1.tar
Hopefully this will work with no doctest failures on some systems.
Let me know what happens.
William
--~--~-~--~--
cwitty wrote:
> Well, I could be convinced otherwise. I think it's a good thing that
> ZZ(3.0) == 3, but Sloane sequences could do more input validation than
> just calling ZZ(). I don't actually care whether an index of 20.0
> works or not.
>
Yes, you are right, there should be more input va
On Oct 13, 1:56 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cwitty wrote:
> > On Oct 13, 10:30 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In sloane_functions.py sequence can now be indexed by reals!?
> >> a(1.0) returns a value. Formerly an error was raised.
>
> > In SloaneSequence.__call__()
Hi Michael,
mabshoff wrote:
> Carl Witty has opened tickets for all the issues in trac and there are
> already some patches. So if you want to help out joins us in IRC, so
> that way we do not duplicate efforts.
>
No, sorry but I will not join the party. I need a good night rest!
Do you ever sl
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:10 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've posted the first alpha release of sage-2.8.7 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
>
> It is probably somewhat broken. Building it, contributing
> fixes, etc., would be greatly appreciated.
Here're the test results
Carl Witty has opened tickets for all the issues in trac and there are
already some patches. So if you want to help out joins us in IRC, so
that way we do not duplicate efforts.
The additional number of doctests failing on FC7 in 32 bit mode might
be related to coercion issues, see #833 for the b
cwitty wrote:
> On Oct 13, 10:30 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In sloane_functions.py sequence can now be indexed by reals!?
>> a(1.0) returns a value. Formerly an error was raised.
>
> In SloaneSequence.__call__() (which is shared among all sequences) the
> first thing it does is
On Oct 13, 10:30 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In sloane_functions.py sequence can now be indexed by reals!?
> a(1.0) returns a value. Formerly an error was raised.
In SloaneSequence.__call__() (which is shared among all sequences) the
first thing it does is "m = ZZ(n)", to coerce i
On Oct 13, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
>> On Oct 13, 10:10 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> This is odd. The test passes on my Ubuntu 32-bit P4 system. It looks
> like the edges are returned in a different order for you, so the
> answer
> is co
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> This is odd. The test passes on my Ubuntu 32-bit P4 system. It looks
>> like the edges are returned in a different order for you, so the answer
>> is correct, just output differently.
>>
>> I can't build the alpha right now, but someone that has the a
Jason Grout wrote:
> This is odd. The test passes on my Ubuntu 32-bit P4 system. It looks
> like the edges are returned in a different order for you, so the answer
> is correct, just output differently.
>
> I can't build the alpha right now, but someone that has the alpha built,
> can you see
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 13, 10:10 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've posted the first alpha release of sage-2.8.7 here:
>>
>>http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
>>
>> It is probably somewhat broken. Building it, contributing
>> fixes, etc., would be great
William Stein wrote:
>
> It is probably somewhat broken. Building it, contributing
> fixes, etc., would be greatly appreciated.
A lot of test failures on Fedora 7:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/wester.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/li
Hi,
I just landed in Albuquerque, NM (free wifi, excellent power
outlets, etc., at their airport!).
Anyway, I get similar doctest failures on most architecture.
As Michael says, if anybody wants to help on this, report the
failure as a trac ticket, assign it to sage-2.8.7, and fix it.
Then hopef
On Oct 13, 10:10 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted the first alpha release of sage-2.8.7 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/
>
> It is probably somewhat broken. Building it, contributing
> fixes, etc., would be greatly appreciated.
Hello,
build
On Oct 12, 4:59 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to try to put sage-2.8.7 together this evening, starting
> at about 5pm my time. If anybody is interested in helping out,
> I'll be on IRC #sage-devel (and in the Sage lab if you're local).
Count me in, assuming
36 matches
Mail list logo
