cwitty wrote: > Well, I could be convinced otherwise. I think it's a good thing that > ZZ(3.0) == 3, but Sloane sequences could do more input validation than > just calling ZZ(). I don't actually care whether an index of 20.0 > works or not. >
Yes, you are right, there should be more input validation. You don't care about the indexing, but in the context of integer sequences the index must be an integer, Most entries of the OEIS are supposed to be indexed by positive integers, some are by non negative integers and quite a few allow a negative index, but Neil Sloane is removing this option. Regards, Jaap --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
