[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8.>=6 on RHEL

2007-10-17 Thread William Stein
On 10/17/07, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > We did a fresh install of RHEL 5 and tried to install sage-2.8.6 (and . > 7), and we got the following error message: > > The SAGE install tree may have moved. > Regenerating Python.pyo and .pyc files that hardcode the install

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-28 Thread David Harvey
I upgraded from XCode 2.2 to 2.4.1, and this seems to fix the problem (although I don't really understand why). It compiles fine now and all tests pass. I will close the ticket now. david On Aug 14, 2007, at 3:46 PM, David Harvey wrote: > Something goes wrong in LAPACK build: > > sage-spkg

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-16 Thread David Harvey
On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:38 PM, William Stein wrote: > I don't know, but you might want to try this tarball: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/lj/sage-2.8.a.tar > > This has the option of doing >export SAGE_FORTRAN=/path/to/any/fortran > etc and many other build improvements. > Please give

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-16 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Aug 16, 2007, at 11:07 AM, David Harvey wrote: > > > On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > Has the included fortran binary been tested on other similar systems? >>> >>> Yes, it works fine on fermat.math.harvard.edu, and I think on Justin >>> Walker's G5. >> >> Yup.

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-16 Thread William Stein
On 8/16/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > >>> Has the included fortran binary been tested on other similar > >>> systems? > >> > >> Yes, it works fine on fermat.math.harvard.edu, and I think on Justin > >> Walker's G5. > > > > Yup

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-16 Thread David Harvey
On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote: >>> Has the included fortran binary been tested on other similar >>> systems? >> >> Yes, it works fine on fermat.math.harvard.edu, and I think on Justin >> Walker's G5. > > Yup. SAGE 2.8 builds and passes 'make test' on my G5 (both for me

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-16 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:21 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On 8/15/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well the included binary works at least to this extent: >> >> ~/sage-2.8/local/bin >> george$ ./sage_fortran.bin --version >> G95 (GCC 4.0.3 (g95 0.91!) Jun 4 2007) >> Copyright (C) 2002

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-15 Thread William Stein
On 8/15/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well the included binary works at least to this extent: > > ~/sage-2.8/local/bin > george$ ./sage_fortran.bin --version > G95 (GCC 4.0.3 (g95 0.91!) Jun 4 2007) > Copyright (C) 2002-2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > Let me try installing

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-15 Thread David Harvey
On Aug 15, 2007, at 10:08 PM, William Stein wrote: >> Here's another failure which I don't believe is scipy-related, but >> might be a clue: > > That is fortran related. It fails for the same reason that lapack > woulnd't work for you -- the g95 fortran binary we included for > SAGE doesn't wor

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-15 Thread William Stein
On 8/15/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:03 PM, William Stein wrote: > > > Just for debuging purposes, could you do the following and > > report what happens? > > > > Fake lapack-20070723 for now, e.g., do > > cd SAGE_ROOT > > touch spkg/installed/lapack-2007

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-15 Thread David Harvey
On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:03 PM, William Stein wrote: > Just for debuging purposes, could you do the following and > report what happens? > > Fake lapack-20070723 for now, e.g., do > cd SAGE_ROOT > touch spkg/installed/lapack-20070723 > Continue the build with "make" and do the same as above > f

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-15 Thread William Stein
David, Just for debuging purposes, could you do the following and report what happens? Fake lapack-20070723 for now, e.g., do cd SAGE_ROOT touch spkg/installed/lapack-20070723 Continue the build with "make" and do the same as above for whatever else fails. You'll just cut off the connected

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-14 Thread David Harvey
On Aug 14, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> Something goes wrong in LAPACK build: >> >> sage-spkg installed/lapack-20070723 2>&1 > [snip] >> make[2]: *** [lapack_install] Error 126 >> Error compiling lapack. > > A shot in the dark: can you check your install log for lines > containin

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8 build fails on G5 powerpc OS 10.4.10

2007-08-14 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Aug 14, 2007, at 12:46 , David Harvey wrote: > > Something goes wrong in LAPACK build: > > sage-spkg installed/lapack-20070723 2>&1 [snip] > make[2]: *** [lapack_install] Error 126 > Error compiling lapack. A shot in the dark: can you check your install log for lines containing "fork:"? I

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8

2007-08-14 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 05:46:36AM -0700, William Stein wrote: > (3) Maybe (I haven't tested this) do >sage: notebook(reset=True) This works fine, thanks. It prompts for a new password and then continues. regards, Jan -- .~. /V\ Jan Groenewald /( )\www.aims.ac.za ^^-^

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8

2007-08-13 Thread William Stein
On 8/13/07, Jan Groenewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:00:20PM -0700, William Stein wrote: > > I've released sage-2.8. Get it now at http://sagemath.org/ or > > do "sage -upgrade". (Binaries will appear in the near future.) > > I run Ubuntu feisty 7.04, up to d

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8

2007-08-13 Thread William Stein
On 8/13/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Upgrade question: I have been editing two .gp scripts (in > data/extcode/pari/simon) and two .py scripts (in > devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves and > devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves) with a view to providing > a patch

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8

2007-08-13 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:00:20PM -0700, William Stein wrote: > I've released sage-2.8. Get it now at http://sagemath.org/ or > do "sage -upgrade". (Binaries will appear in the near future.) I run Ubuntu feisty 7.04, up to date from the repositories. sage2.6 and 2.7 all installed with the

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8

2007-08-13 Thread John Cremona
Upgrade question: I have been editing two .gp scripts (in data/extcode/pari/simon) and two .py scripts (in devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves and devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves) with a view to providing a patch soon. If I do "sage -upgrade" now will those be overwritten?

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8

2007-08-12 Thread mabshoff
On Aug 13, 7:00 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hello, > > I've released sage-2.8. Get it now athttp://sagemath.org/or > do "sage -upgrade". (Binaries will appear in the near future.) > > This is a fairly nontrivial upgrade, mainly because it includes > a major new versi

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8 on sunday

2007-08-12 Thread John Cremona
Sorry about that, hope I'm not too late! John On 8/12/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/12/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Attached are some files for mwrank which have had minor modifications > > (for the purpose of making the saturation part of mwrank more >

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8 on sunday

2007-08-12 Thread William Stein
On 8/12/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached are some files for mwrank which have had minor modifications > (for the purpose of making the saturation part of mwrank more > efficient). No changes to interface required, just replace th > existing files with these. > > arith.h > pa

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8 on sunday

2007-08-12 Thread mabshoff
On Aug 12, 5:33 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/12/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 12, 7:58 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Hello, > > > > I'm going to release sage-2.8 tomorrow (Sunday), so if you have > > > any patch

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8 on sunday

2007-08-12 Thread William Stein
On 8/12/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 12, 7:58 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Hello, > > > > > I'm going to release sage-2.8 tomorrow (Sunday), so if you have > > any patches you're about to send me, send them to me asap. > > > > I will release someth

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.8 on sunday

2007-08-12 Thread mabshoff
On Aug 12, 7:58 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hello, > > I'm going to release sage-2.8 tomorrow (Sunday), so if you have > any patches you're about to send me, send them to me asap. > > I will release something tomorrow one way or another, even if it > possibly means not