On Aug 15, 2007, at 10:08 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's another failure which I don't believe is scipy-related, but >> might be a clue: > > That is fortran related. It fails for the same reason that lapack > woulnd't work for you -- the g95 fortran binary we included for > SAGE doesn't work correctly for you for some reason. > In the next SAGE release, one will have the option to specify > an alternative compiler. You could, e.g., install gfortran (easy > to get for Mac os x), and it might work fine for you. Well the included binary works at least to this extent: ~/sage-2.8/local/bin george$ ./sage_fortran.bin --version G95 (GCC 4.0.3 (g95 0.91!) Jun 4 2007) Copyright (C) 2002-2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Let me try installing gfortran as you suggest and see if the whole thing builds properly then. Has the included fortran binary been tested on other similar systems? david --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
