On Sep 16, 2007, at 10:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On 9/16/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> (0) The talk on SAGE went quite well and generated interest.
Glad to hear.
>> Which basic commands (like polynomial
>> multiplication) can be parallelized?
[...]
> So I think nontrivi
On 9/17/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
> I thought the problem is that no one has configured Apache on
> sage.math to use SSL for use with sagenb.org and sagenb.com.
>
Timothy is right. The main reason that I turned off ssl is
that I have not been able to configure apache to corr
I thought the problem is that no one has configured Apache on
sage.math to use SSL for use with sagenb.org and sagenb.com.
On 9/17/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> >> For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed thing
On Sep 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>> For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed things so that the
>> public notebook server:
>>(1) Doesn't use ssl at all, and
>>(2) Is at http://sagenb.org (and another at http://
>> sagenb.com), so
>> there is no funn
> For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed things so that the
> public notebook server:
>(1) Doesn't use ssl at all, and
>(2) Is at http://sagenb.org (and another at http://sagenb.com), so
> there is no funny business with ports.
> Thus the above setup shouldn't get blo
Speaking of parallel processing in Python, I recently heard about the
pp module:
http://www.parallelpython.com/ It may be something that we want to look at.
--Mike
On 9/16/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/16/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some comments on t
On 9/16/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some comments on the recent GAP comments relevant to SAGE:
>
> (0) The talk on SAGE went quite well and generated interest.
Excellent.
> (1) Many GAP developers and some GAP packages authors like
> SAGE and plan on looking into the extra func
