On Saturday 06 September 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
> > What do you think of (optionally) adding a doc/ subdirectory to each
> > spkg? When the spkg, say foo-1.2.3.spkg is installed, the directory
> >
> >SAGE_ROOT/doc/packages/foo
> >
> > would be a copy of that doc/ subdirectory.
>
> +1 ... or
> What do you think of (optionally) adding a doc/ subdirectory to each spkg?
> When the spkg, say foo-1.2.3.spkg is installed, the directory
>
>SAGE_ROOT/doc/packages/foo
>
> would be a copy of that doc/ subdirectory.
>
+1 ... or +100, if I'm allowed. :) Seriously, though, this would be a
*hu
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:43 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The idea is that this would be very helpful for people on airplanes,
>> etc., without
>> internet access, who really want to browse say the GMP docs or the
>> Python
>> docs, but can't because they don't have internet access
> The idea is that this would be very helpful for people on airplanes,
> etc., without
> internet access, who really want to browse say the GMP docs or the
> Python
> docs, but can't because they don't have internet access or the
> tools to build the docs from source.
I get some good work done on
>> My proposal introduces absolutely no dependencies at any time,
>> either build or install time.
>
> Then how do we get the documentation in html or pdf form?
That is up to the package maintainer. I would get say just the html version
of the Python documentation here:
http://www.python.org/do
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:30 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:27 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This could make it harder for Timothy Abbott to create debian versions.
>> Based on some posted to debian-science, it appears that certain
>>
On Sep 5, 10:29 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:20 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Are you saying (1) "We might as well do this"? Or, are you saying,
> >> (2) "I think your proposal is bad; instead, I propose we build from source
> >> t
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:27 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This could make it harder for Timothy Abbott to create debian versions.
> Based on some posted to debian-science, it appears that certain
> debian maintainers have a negative view of the GNU FDL, which some
> documentatio
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:20 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 5, 10:15 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > Thoughts?
>>
>> > It will increase the size of spkgs which is not a good thing
This could make it harder for Timothy Abbott to create debian versions.
Based on some posted to debian-science, it appears that certain
debian maintainers have a negative view of the GNU FDL, which some
documentation is licensed under. Pushing FDL docs into a GPL's package
might make the entire th
On Sep 5, 10:15 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Thoughts?
>
> > It will increase the size of spkgs which is not a good thing.
>
> Yes, it will increase the size of spkgs. This is the tradeoff.
> It wil
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Thoughts?
>
> It will increase the size of spkgs which is not a good thing.
Yes, it will increase the size of spkgs. This is the tradeoff.
It will not increase the build time noticeably.
> How many
> spkgs are actually
On Sep 5, 10:01 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sep 5, 2008, at 9:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> > What do you think of (optionally) adding a doc/ subdirectory to
> > each spkg?
> > When the spkg, say foo-1.2.3.spkg is installed, the directory
>
>
On Sep 5, 2008, at 9:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> What do you think of (optionally) adding a doc/ subdirectory to
> each spkg?
> When the spkg, say foo-1.2.3.spkg is installed, the directory
>
> SAGE_ROOT/doc/packages/foo
>
> would be a copy of that doc/ subdirectory.
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
