On Sep 5, 10:29 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:20 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<SNIP>
> >> Are you saying (1) "We might as well do this"? Or, are you saying,
> >> (2) "I think your proposal is bad; instead, I propose we build from source
> >> the documentation for each spkg, and install that into $SAGE_LOCAL"?
>
> > Into a doc directory, i.e. $SAGE_LOCAL/doc/foo for foo.spkg? I don't
> > care either way :)
>
> I don't understand. (1) or (2) or?
I don't care either way, I was just wondering where the documentation
would be installed per default.
> >> > We might introduce some build dependency that we did not have before,
> >> > so that is a definite concern of mine.
>
> >> My proposal introduces absolutely no build dependencies.
>
> > At install time, but it would introduce some dependencies at build
> > time of the spkg. Those can be more easily dealt with obviously :)
>
> My proposal introduces absolutely no dependencies at any time,
> either build or install time.
Then how do we get the documentation in html or pdf form?
> -- William
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
