>> teragon-2:build was$ ./sage-3.0.4.rc0/sage -startuptime |grep sympy
>>sympy: 0.098 (sage.calculus.calculus)
>
> Yes, I am sorry about this trojan horse, it was definitely not an
> intention. :) I hope after the patch all will be fine.
>
I forgot to mention that we spent a lot of ti
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:50 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:27 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:27 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> 2008/7/9 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for doing all this! See Sage integrates into your
> environment after all :-).
Yes and it made me pretty excited!! Only it
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> 2008/7/9 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks for doing all this! See Sage integrates into your
environment after all :-).
>>> Yes and it made me pretty excited!! Only it's 4x slower than sympy:
>> Is that "4 x" all Sage startup time, i.e., the time to do
>>
2008/7/9 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Thanks for doing all this! See Sage integrates into your
>>> environment after all :-).
>>
>> Yes and it made me pretty excited!! Only it's 4x slower than sympy:
>
> Is that "4 x" all Sage startup time, i.e., the time to do
> "from sage.all import *
>> Thanks for doing all this! See Sage integrates into your
>> environment after all :-).
>
> Yes and it made me pretty excited!! Only it's 4x slower than sympy:
Is that "4 x" all Sage startup time, i.e., the time to do
"from sage.all import *"? Shouldn't you time something
like this:
sage: tim
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:36 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:27 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:27 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:27 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
The only remain
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
The only remai
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> The only remaining annoying thing is this one LD_LIBRARY_PATH thing.
>>> I'll probably put it t
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> The only remaining annoying thing is this one LD_LIBRARY_PATH thing.
>>> I'll probably put it t
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> The only remaining annoying thing is this one LD_LIBRARY_PATH thing.
>> I'll probably put it to my .bashrc, as there doesn't seem to be any
>> way around it.
>>
> It's probabl
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> The only remaining annoying thing is this one LD_LIBRARY_PATH thing.
> I'll probably put it to my .bashrc, as there doesn't seem to be any
> way around it.
>
It's probably better to make a small launcher script setting the variable
correctly. I have seen
15 matches
Mail list logo