Ondrej Certik wrote: > 2008/7/9 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> Thanks for doing all this! See Sage integrates into your >>>> environment after all :-). >>> Yes and it made me pretty excited!! Only it's 4x slower than sympy: >> Is that "4 x" all Sage startup time, i.e., the time to do >> "from sage.all import *"? > > Yes. I work in a way that I edit a python file and the run it in > python. So if the packages takes 2s to import, I need to wait for 2s > everytime I edit > a file and test it.
Sounds like what you'd want is more about supporting your workflow pattern than better startup times as such? I.e. something like a sage command-line program that would connect with a sage server and run your command could work. Psuedo-code: $ sage -server $ sage -client s.py I.e; a "command-line notebook runner", where you keep your "notebooks" in Python text files, and the SAGE process stays resident. Not sure if something like that exists already -- just saying that I think focusing too hard on the startup time of the SAGE process might be the wrong way to go about this. (Disclaimer: I'm only a lurker here and don't really have a clue.) -- Dag Sverre --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
