On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>> I don't see the need, and I'm always leery of overpopulating the
>> namespace :-} You already have the functionality, and with '?',
>> it is
>> easily accessible.
>
> I don't always support synonyms but I do want all those little helper
>
> I don't see the need, and I'm always leery of overpopulating the
> namespace :-} You already have the functionality, and with '?', it is
> easily accessible.
I don't always support synonyms but I do want all those little helper
functions. The point is to make it easy to read code -- eigensy
On Apr 3, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
> ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
> which function goes with which type.
>
> How about we unify the interface?
+1 This has bothered me too.
What about including the eigenvalue multiplicities as well?
John
On 03/04/2008, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 07:52 , Alex Ghitza wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > William Stein wrote:
> > | On Thu, Apr 3, 2008
On Apr 3, 2008, at 07:52 , Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> William Stein wrote:
> | On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> |>
> |> On Apr 3, 2008, at 03:38 , Jason Grout wrote:
[snip]
> |> I don't see the need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Stein wrote:
| On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|>
|> On Apr 3, 2008, at 03:38 , Jason Grout wrote:
|> >
|> > Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
|> > ways to get
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 03:38 , Jason Grout wrote:
> >
> > Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
> > ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
> > which functi
On Apr 3, 2008, at 03:38 , Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
> ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
> which function goes with which type.
>
> How about we unify the interface?
>
> Proposal:
>
> eigenspaces:
David Joyner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
>> ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
>> which function goes with which type.
>>
>> How about we
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
> ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
> which function goes with which type.
>
> How about we unify the interface?
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
