> I don't see the need, and I'm always leery of overpopulating the > namespace :-} You already have the functionality, and with '?', it is > easily accessible.
I don't always support synonyms but I do want all those little helper functions. The point is to make it easy to read code -- eigensystem () makes the intention clear, whereas (eigenvalues(), eigenvectors()) obscures the meaning. I don't want to lose that declaration of intent just to keep the namespace small. Nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
