Re: [sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-28 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:36 AM, leif wrote: >> >> >> On 27 Okt., 09:56, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> On 2010-10-27 09:36, Robert Bradshaw wrote:> The larger problem with the >>> current system is not that it's hard to >>> > comment on a sin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-28 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:36 AM, leif wrote: > > > On 27 Okt., 09:56, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> On 2010-10-27 09:36, Robert Bradshaw wrote:> The larger problem with the >> current system is not that it's hard to >> > comment on a single line, but it's way to much work to *fix* a single >> > line.

[sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-28 Thread leif
On 27 Okt., 09:56, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2010-10-27 09:36, Robert Bradshaw wrote:> The larger problem with the > current system is not that it's hard to > > comment on a single line, but it's way to much work to *fix* a single > > line. > > I would say it's mainly way too much work to get

Re: [sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-27 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, >> Is there an open-source project out there like bitbucket (i.e., like >> Gitorious is for git hosting?)?  Is Google code better than bitbucket? > > Since bitbuckets tagline is "Free code hosting for 5 users. Unlimited > private or public repositories.", I would say Google code is vastly > be

[sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Brickenstein
> Since bitbuckets tagline is "Free code hosting for 5 users. Unlimited > private or public repositories.", I would say Google code is vastly > better, since it is free for arbitrarily many users. Nothing against google, but the five user limit on bitbucket only affects private repositories. Chee

Re: [sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:22 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jason Grout > wrote: >> On 10/26/10 7:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >>> >>> On 10/27/10 12:54 AM, William Stein wrote: Hi, I just spent the day working on code with some people, and using

Re: [sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-26 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 10/26/10 7:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> >> On 10/27/10 12:54 AM, William Stein wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just spent the day working on code with some people, and using >>> http://code.google.com with multiple cloned repositories and

[sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-26 Thread leif
On 27 Okt., 02:04, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > On 10/27/10 12:54 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I just spent the day working on code with some people, and using > >http://code.google.comwith multiple cloned repositories and their > > code review system, which allows excellent line by lin

[sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-26 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/26/10 7:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: On 10/27/10 12:54 AM, William Stein wrote: Hi, I just spent the day working on code with some people, and using http://code.google.com with multiple cloned repositories and their code review system, which allows excellent line by line annotation, all