On Jan 11, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>
>> Works great for me. My only question is why you have .tar.gz files in
>> the dependancies directory instead of just putting the source itself
>> there (as the whole things is compressed anyways).
>
> I thought that people who wer
Robert wrote:
> Works great for me. My only question is why you have .tar.gz files in
> the dependancies directory instead of just putting the source itself
> there (as the whole things is compressed anyways).
I thought that people who were interested in the source version of
this package might
Works great for me. My only question is why you have .tar.gz files in
the dependancies directory instead of just putting the source itself
there (as the whole things is compressed anyways).
Did you want to post a link to this up at trac?
- Robert
On Jan 11, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Ted Kosan wro
Robert,
When you get a chance, version 2 of the jmol-src spkg is ready to test:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/tkosan/misc/jmol-11.5.2-src-v2.spkg
Thanks :-)
Ted
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To uns
Robert wrote:
> I ran into an error compiling
> Log4j12, any ideas. (I've been busy at the conference the last couple
> of days, but could look more into this maybe when I get home).
I discovered that this was caused by a jar file I didn't know I had in
my classplath. I am in the process of cre
Ted,
Thanks, this looks like a lot of work! I ran into an error compiling
Log4j12, any ideas. (I've been busy at the conference the last couple
of days, but could look more into this maybe when I get home).
- Robert
On Jan 6, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> The jmol-11.
Robert,
The jmol-11.5.2-src.spkg is ready for testing and it can be found here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/tkosan/misc/jmol-11.5.2-src.spkg
Ted
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from t
On Jan 5, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> Its all building from source now. Here is the list of packages that
> needed to be created:
>
> commons-lang
> commons-logging
> commons-cli
> bcmail
> bcprov
> itext
> jmol-acme
> netscape
> vecmath-objectclub
> jmol
>
> It runs from the command l
Its all building from source now. Here is the list of packages that
needed to be created:
commons-lang
commons-logging
commons-cli
bcmail
bcprov
itext
jmol-acme
netscape
vecmath-objectclub
jmol
It runs from the command line but I am not quite sure how to test it
completely at this point so ther
Robert wrote:
> > Do you think it is okay to manually edit the various build scripts to
> > make them build as desired and then just record what was edited in the
> > SPKG.txt file?
>
> The route we have traditionally gone down is to place patch files in
> a "patches" directory and then apply the
On Jan 4, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Do you think it is okay to manually edit the various build scripts to
> make them build as desired and then just record what was edited in the
> SPKG.txt file?
The route we have traditionally gone down is to place patch files in
a "pat
On Jan 4, 2008 9:39 AM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> Do you think it is okay to manually edit the various build scripts to
> make them build as desired and then just record what was edited in the
> SPKG.txt file?
>
> Also, how much software can we require the user have pre-
Robert,
Do you think it is okay to manually edit the various build scripts to
make them build as desired and then just record what was edited in the
SPKG.txt file?
Also, how much software can we require the user have pre-installed on
their system before building jmol-src.spkg? At this point we
Robert Wrote:
> > The idea of a dependences directory sounds good. I have not tried
> > building the support jars from source yet, but if you would like me to
> > I can work on this.
>
> That would be great.
I built the support jars from source, but this process certainly is
ugly. Here are the
On Jan 3, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>
>> Here is the reduced list of .jar files I was able
>>> to achieve a successful build with:
>>>
>>> Acme.jar commons-cli-1.0.jar netscape.jar
>>> ant-contrib.jar itext-1.4.5.jar vecmath1.2-1.14.jar
>>
>> Excellent. Hav
Robert wrote:
>Here is the reduced list of .jar files I was able
> > to achieve a successful build with:
> >
> > Acme.jar commons-cli-1.0.jar netscape.jar
> > ant-contrib.jar itext-1.4.5.jar vecmath1.2-1.14.jar
>
> Excellent. Have you been able to build any of these? Perhaps we
> s
On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>
>> There are several other dependencies that are provided as jar files
>> that we'll need to build as well, so this is further from done than I
>> had supposed.
>
> Here is a list of the jar files that come in the jmol tarball:
>
> Ac
Robert wrote:
> There are several other dependencies that are provided as jar files
> that we'll need to build as well, so this is further from done than I
> had supposed.
Here is a list of the jar files that come in the jmol tarball:
Acme.jar gnujaxp-onlysax.jar junit.jar vecm
On Jan 3, 2008 3:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> > On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
> >
> >> On Jan 2, 2008 4:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:05 PM
On Jan 2, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Jan 2, 2008 4:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>>>
I have jmol building/installing from source,
>>>
>>> Thank
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 4:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>>
>>> I have jmol building/installing from source,
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> but in the interest of
>>> saving time I am not goi
On Jan 2, 2008 4:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> > I have jmol building/installing from source,
>
> Thanks.
>
> > but in the interest of
> > saving time I am not going to go through the last step of making an
> > actual spkg ou
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> I have jmol building/installing from source,
Thanks.
> but in the interest of
> saving time I am not going to go through the last step of making an
> actual spkg out of it because I have not done this before and it will
> probably take me some time
I have jmol building/installing from source, but in the interest of
saving time I am not going to go through the last step of making an
actual spkg out of it because I have not done this before and it will
probably take me some time for me to get it right.
Here is a .zip file that contains the fi
Robert wrote:
> Is there anything it doesn't do when you cd to the jmol directory and
> type ant? I think it should be a matter of adding this to the top of
> the spkg-install script, right?
If ant is run immediately after unarchiving the jmol tarball, an error
is generated because a keystore ne
On Jan 2, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>
>> I think it's safe to assume the JDK and ant, and eventually make an
>> ant spkg if needed. (That's what I was planning on doing.)
>
> Okay, I will give this a try then and I hope to have something
> available within a few hours.
I
Robert wrote:
> I think it's safe to assume the JDK and ant, and eventually make an
> ant spkg if needed. (That's what I was planning on doing.)
Okay, I will give this a try then and I hope to have something
available within a few hours.
Ted
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
On Jan 2, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> William wrote:
>
>> I would very much like it if somebody would make a build-from-
>> source version of
>> the jmol package:
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/jmol-11.5.1.spkg
>>
>> See below.
>>
>> Any volunteers?
>
> I will give
William wrote:
> I would very much like it if somebody would make a build-from-source version
> of
> the jmol package:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/jmol-11.5.1.spkg
>
> See below.
>
> Any volunteers?
I will give it a try. Are we assuming that the person installing the
sou
On Jan 2, 2008 12:05 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would very much like it if somebody would make a build-from-source version
> of
> the jmol package:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/jmol-11.5.1.spkg
>
> See below.
>
> Any volunteers?
I've made this
Hi,
I would very much like it if somebody would make a build-from-source version of
the jmol package:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/jmol-11.5.1.spkg
See below.
Any volunteers?
-- William
On Jan 2, 2008 11:23 AM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In principle, al
31 matches
Mail list logo
