[sage-devel] Re: Axiom and Sage

2007-12-09 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 10, 7:49 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well,per your request, I logged in to the Sage VM and did > sage -f fricas-0.3.1 > simply hangs. However, > sage -f axiom4sage-0.3.1 > succeeds and shows a total time of > real 18m42 > or, if I include network time > real 19.6 > which is abo

[sage-devel] Re: Axiom and Sage

2007-12-09 Thread TimDaly
> Two points: > (1) "All Axiom needs is a mathml enabled browser with the correct fonts." >This is a nontrivial assumption to make. E.g., I have this on none of > my web browsers and mathml doesn't ship with browsers yet. > Mathml ships with Firefox although you have to install some extra fo

[sage-devel] Re: Axiom and Sage

2007-12-09 Thread TimDaly
On Dec 9, 3:25 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2007 1:00 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >The main plus of this packaging for sage is that it builds from > > >source quickly (in a few minutes) using precompiled clisp files. > > > Well, on my 2Ghz machine with

[sage-devel] Re: Axiom and Sage

2007-12-09 Thread William Stein
On Dec 9, 2007 1:00 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The main plus of this packaging for sage is that it builds from > >source quickly (in a few minutes) using precompiled clisp files. > > Well, on my 2Ghz machine with 2 Gig of memory running VMWare and > using the sage vmware image (but upg

[sage-devel] Re: Axiom and Sage

2007-12-09 Thread root
>The main plus of this packaging for sage is that it builds from >source quickly (in a few minutes) using precompiled clisp files. Well, on my 2Ghz machine with 2 Gig of memory running VMWare and using the sage vmware image (but upgrading the VM to have 1G memory) I started the package-install at

[sage-devel] Re: Axiom and Sage

2007-12-09 Thread William Stein
On Dec 9, 2007 10:42 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having downloaded the Sage vmware image and done a > package-install('axiom4sage...') I find that Sage is > not running Axiom but Fricas, which is a fork. That's > fine but I'd appreciate it if you be specific that > you're using Fricas, not A

[sage-devel] Re: axiom and sage

2007-07-08 Thread David Joyner
On 7/8/07, Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some ideas: > > 1. Assuimg Axiom becomes part of SAGE, all Axiom patches are > > to be voted on democratically among the Axiom deveopers. > > (Majority rules.) > > > Any comments on any of this? > > Do you work in sage like that "majority rul