That's great, thanks! Hope someone will review it in time for 4.1.
Cheers,
Stan
kcrisman wrote:
> See # 5649.
>
> - kcrisman
> >
>
--
Stan Schymanski
Scientist
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Postfach 10 01 64
D-07701 Jena
Phone: +49.3641.
Sorry, the behaviour I reported is caused by something else. I copied
the cell code that produced different plots at every evaluation into a
new notebook and got consistent results every time. Even copying and
pasting into a new cell got rid of the random behaviour of the axes.
Very weird. I t
See # 5649.
- kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group
> should be the highest value of the plot. I assume that the show
> boundaries overwrite the plot boundaries. I can see that this is
> necessary if a function has a vertical asymptote in the plotted range,
> but maybe it would be helpful to still make sure that the values at the
Again, I don't th
In this case, I suspect that evaluation at the boundaries themselves is
missing. The function I was plotting decreases monotonically with a
large slope at the lower boundary, so the y-value at the lower boundary
should be the highest value of the plot. I assume that the show
boundaries overwri
On Jun 26, 9:47 am, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> This makes sense, thanks. The function that made me discover this
> behaviour does indeed tend towards an infinite slope at the boundary of
> the range I prescribed. However, I am not sure if I understand
> correctly. Can it happen that points outsid
This makes sense, thanks. The function that made me discover this
behaviour does indeed tend towards an infinite slope at the boundary of
the range I prescribed. However, I am not sure if I understand
correctly. Can it happen that points outside of the range specified by
xmin and xmax are eval
> Would it help to open a ticket for motivation? I noticed another issue,
> namely that the y-axis range is chosen randomly and the plots look
> different every time they are evaluated. I remember reading something
> about this bug a while ago but I don't remember where.
Believe it or not, this
Yes, solving # 5448 might solve it all. Thanks for pointing it out. I'm
glad mhansen is working on it, although the last post was 3 months ago.
Cheers,
Stan
kcrisman wrote:
>> I remember that the axes labelling in plot() has been discussed a
>> while ago, but it seems that it still has not been
Would it help to open a ticket for motivation? I noticed another issue,
namely that the y-axis range is chosen randomly and the plots look
different every time they are evaluated. I remember reading something
about this bug a while ago but I don't remember where.
Stan
William Stein wrote:
> O
> I remember that the axes labelling in plot() has been discussed a
> while ago, but it seems that it still has not been fixed. If the range
> on the y-axis contains only very small numbers, the labels disappear
> altogether. Example:
>
> plot(2^(-20*x),(x,1,10))
>
> This is in sage-4.0.2. Does an
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Stan Schymanski wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I remember that the axes labelling in plot() has been discussed a
> while ago, but it seems that it still has not been fixed. If the range
> on the y-axis contains only very small numbers, the labels disappear
> altogether.
12 matches
Mail list logo
