Volker Braun writes:
> Incidentally, about the legacy code for loading old notebooks: here
> is one lesson to be learned about long-term support of data files.
> The only sane way to handle this imho is:
>
> * The current code can read/write the current data format
> * Whenever you upgrade from fo
Hi,
We should remove that code for loading old notebook server installs.
We established a 1-year deprecation policy for the Sage project long
ago, and that applies here. The functionality being deprecated is
"read a notebook server install in a certain format", and it has been
deprecated for abou
On 2012-11-11 00:17, David Kirkby wrote:
> I'm guessing nobody is going to write any doctests for code which is
> only there to maintain backward compatibility. So if it remains
> untested, why should it be removed from the test figures?
+1 on this.
This is code which is apparently still used (if o
On Saturday, November 10, 2012 7:36:43 PM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> I don't really care about whether the coverage is a percent more or less.
> But if you want to have the nodoctest.py functionality then the marked
> directories should not be counted.
>
> Incidentally, about the legacy cod
I don't really care about whether the coverage is a percent more or less.
But if you want to have the nodoctest.py functionality then the marked
directories should not be counted.
Incidentally, about the legacy code for loading old notebooks: here is one
lesson to be learned about long-term sup
On 10 November 2012 21:49, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:41:01 PM UTC-8, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 10, 1:35 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>> > By the way, to clarify: this will only affect the 'server' directory.
>> > which
>> > consists of unused code (old no
On Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:41:01 PM UTC-8, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 1:35 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> > By the way, to clarify: this will only affect the 'server' directory.
> which
> > consists of unused code (old notebook code, superseded by sagenb), since
> > that's the on
On Nov 10, 1:35 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> By the way, to clarify: this will only affect the 'server' directory. which
> consists of unused code (old notebook code, superseded by sagenb), since
> that's the only place there are files called 'nodoctest.py'.
Do we have a good reason to carry aro
