Fredrik Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's something to try:
>
> FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
> Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
> work.
>
For me building with the express e
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's something to try:
>
> FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
> Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
> work.
>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's something to try:
>
> FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
> Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
> work.
M
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>> [...]
>>> If you are interested in helping, see the web page, download the
>>> newest zip file and start hacking. If you have something useful to
>>> say, respond to thi
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's something to try:
>
> FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
> Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Here's something to try:
FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
work.
Running sage results in the following (not much in dir()...?):
C:\source
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> [...]
>>
>> If you are interested in helping, see the web page, download the
>> newest zip file and start hacking. If you have something useful to
>> say, respond to this email and join the s
William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
[...]
>
> If you are interested in helping, see the web page, download the
> newest zip file and start hacking. If you have something useful to
> say, respond to this email and join the sage-windows mailing list.
>
Useful? I downloaded MSVC 2008 pro
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Blair wrote:
>
> I thought the complete windows port should be available via SCM.
Yes of course that will be a shortterm goal. Otherwise collaboration
is difficult.
> I find working on downloaded source snapshots a bit too cumbersome.
>
> Is there an advantage
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:57 AM, didier deshommes wrote:
>
> The link to the windows binary seems light (64MB); which parts of
> sage are included in it?
cython, freetype, ipython, libpng, matplotlib, mercurial, moin, mpir,
networkx, numpy, pycrypto, pyreadline, python, pywin32, scons, sympy,
t
TortoiseHg and 32 bit look like they fit the bill for me. Thanks.
On Feb 23, 5:45 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 23, 9:37 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
>
> > On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Blair wrote:
>
> > > My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
>
> > > I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it
On Feb 23, 9:37 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Blair wrote:
>
>
>
> > My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
>
> > I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it has an interface similar to
> > Tortoise SVN. How long would it take to set up the repository with the
> >
On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Blair wrote:
>
> My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
>
> I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it has an interface similar to
> Tortoise SVN. How long would it take to set up the repository with the
> latest source snapshot from the Windows site?
Blair
My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it has an interface similar to
Tortoise SVN. How long would it take to set up the repository with the
latest source snapshot from the Windows site?
On Feb 23, 4:44 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2
I thought the complete windows port should be available via SCM.
I find working on downloaded source snapshots a bit too cumbersome.
Is there an advantage of using HG/Mercurial over SVN. Speed perhaps?
On Windows, TortoiseSVN is very popular among many open source
projects because of its tight i
The link to the windows binary seems light (64MB); which parts of
sage are included in it?
didier
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:00 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> I am getting very impatient about how slowly work on the Microsoft
> Windows Sage Project has been moving. Thus
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Blair wrote:
>
> I will help with the Windows port.
Thanks. What's your last name? I want to add it to the
windows.sagemath.org page. Also, please subscribe to the
sage-windows mailing list.
> Is it feasible to have the source code in SVN?
We'll likely use
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:38 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 23, 3:31 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> If you need visual studio 2008, I have one, which is purchased by my
>> university.
>
> The Sage project has several MSVC 2008 Professional licenses donated
> by Microsoft Research
On Feb 23, 7:52 am, Alfredo Portes wrote:
Hi Alfredo,
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > Anyway, that was a little less than a year ago and I have so far heard
> > zero complaints about Windows 7 breaking the binary API of code. Given
> > that the beta has been downloade
On Feb 23, 6:26 am, Blair wrote:
> I will help with the Windows port.
>
> Is it feasible to have the source code in SVN?
Which source code specifically do you mean?
If things get checked in it won't be SVN, but HG. *Anything* but CVS
or SVN :)
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~---
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> Anyway, that was a little less than a year ago and I have so far heard
> zero complaints about Windows 7 breaking the binary API of code. Given
> that the beta has been downloaded a couple million times from MS
> themselves as well as probably
On Feb 23, 7:45 am, kcrisman wrote:
Hi,
> Just FYI, there is a miniscule typo
> onhttp://wiki.sagemath.org/windows/msvc64-issues
> insofar as it refers to the 32-bit port.
This is correct since for now we are doing 32 bits only, at least from
my end which is complementary to what William do
On Feb 23, 7:41 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
Hi,
> The article was:http://thebetaguy.com/exclusives/?postid=1029344029
> I am not sure about it's technical correctness..
> AAP
Thanks for the link. Note that the article was posted on "Thursday,
April 03, 2008" - I thought maybe it was two da
Just FYI, there is a miniscule typo on
http://wiki.sagemath.org/windows/msvc64-issues
insofar as it refers to the 32-bit port. Also,
http://wiki.sagemath.org/windows/timeline
probably should be updated e.g. with a cut-and-paste of some part of
the OP's first message in this thread. It sounds lik
The article was:http://thebetaguy.com/exclusives/?postid=1029344029
I am not sure about it's technical correctness..
AAP
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:16 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 5:16 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I think one of the main idea behind developing a real altern
I will help with the Windows port.
Is it feasible to have the source code in SVN?
On Feb 23, 5:00 am, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> I am getting very impatient about how slowly work on the Microsoft
> Windows Sage Project has been moving. Thus I've started a new project
> to
On Feb 23, 5:16 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
Hi,
> I think one of the main idea behind developing a real alternative for Magma,
> Matlab, Mathematica etc. is their license costs and restrictions on altering
> the source code etc. Personally, if I had chance to not to use windows, I
> won't. Le
I think one of the main idea behind developing a real alternative for Magma,
Matlab, Mathematica etc. is their license costs and restrictions on altering
the source code etc. Personally, if I had chance to not to use windows, I
won't. Let me give an example, last night I read an article about backw
On Feb 23, 3:37 am, Kenny wrote:
Hi Rob,
> There is no need for a window$ server... don't waste your time in such
> a
> bad way... it is easy to use the wmplayer and the image that the sage
> team
> provides from the website.
There are *plenty* of reasons to do a native port, not but limited
There is no need for a window$ server... don't waste your time in such
a
bad way... it is easy to use the wmplayer and the image that the sage
team
provides from the website.
Obviously don't be mad at me, that's just the way i see and therefore
take it
as a suggestion.
bye Rob.
ahmet alper par
On Feb 23, 3:31 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
Hi,
> If you need visual studio 2008, I have one, which is purchased by my
> university.
The Sage project has several MSVC 2008 Professional licenses donated
by Microsoft Research for the port, so we are good. The point William
was trying to make
If you need visual studio 2008, I have one, which is purchased by my
university. I think it would not be illegal to compile and distribute sage
for you with it. But remember, i am not a lawyer...AAP
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:00 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> I am getting v
32 matches
Mail list logo
