On Thursday 23 October 2008 18:36:33 Jason Grout wrote:
> Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > Yes, this would be helpful. I keep a todo list on a sticky note on my
> > desktop. Here is my list (more or less in order of priority):
> >
> > * evaluation
> > * support for _fast_eval
> > * hash is random
> > * py
Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Yes, this would be helpful. I keep a todo list on a sticky note on my
> desktop. Here is my list (more or less in order of priority):
>
> * evaluation
> * support for _fast_eval
> * hash is random
> * pyobject deallocations, memory leaks
> * print order (William's list)
>
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 16:54:35 William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Jason Grout
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > William Stein wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:30 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> The new variables don't seem to work well with the pl
> If you wrap it in a python function, for now, you can get the functionality
> you want:
> It might exist only in our heads :-) But there is actually a file
> todo.txt that is here in sage-3.2.*:
>
> devel/sage/sage/symbolic/todo.txt
>
Both answers are very helpful - thanks!
- kcrisman
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:30 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The new variables don't seem to work well with the plotting code as
>>> is; I give below output for two plots using old and
kcrisman wrote:
> The new variables don't seem to work well with the plotting code as
> is; I give below output for two plots using old and new variables. I
> assume this is known, but just wanted to put it out there.
>
> On the plus side, the new variables are MUCH faster. How do I know?
> Be
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:30 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The new variables don't seem to work well with the plotting code as
>> is; I give below output for two plots using old and new variables. I
>> assume this is known, but just wanted to put it out there.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:30 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The new variables don't seem to work well with the plotting code as
> is; I give below output for two plots using old and new variables. I
> assume this is known, but just wanted to put it out there.
That's because we have
