In case of non-cooperative sysadmins,
can't you just have instances of MPI installed on your accounts on the
slaves?
I presume each slave has a Sage installation (with OpenMPI), so this
probably means you need to create symbolic links to appropriate
directories, and/or perhaps setting LD_LIBRARY_PA
On Jan 22, 11:26 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Jan 22, 5:32 pm, Mikael Vejdemo Johansson
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, Parallel Python looks really neat. However, I actually use quite
> > a bit of the inter-process communication parts of MPI in my code; and
> > PP doesn't seem to have as useful primitive
On Jan 22, 5:32 pm, Mikael Vejdemo Johansson
wrote:
> Yeah, Parallel Python looks really neat. However, I actually use quite
> a bit of the inter-process communication parts of MPI in my code; and
> PP doesn't seem to have as useful primitives for that.
>
> Is there really no sensible way to use
Yeah, Parallel Python looks really neat. However, I actually use quite
a bit of the inter-process communication parts of MPI in my code; and
PP doesn't seem to have as useful primitives for that.
Is there really no sensible way to use OpenMPI and Sage on more than
one computer?
// Mikael
On Jan
Hi Mikael,
I'd have looked into using Parallel Python (http://
www.parallelpython.com/)
which is just a Python library.
If it worked with Sage, it would be a worthwhile addition to Sage
packages...
Lately there is an ongoing project to make Sage notebook well-
scalable, but I do not know
if parall
