On 6/1/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 20:24, Bobby Moretti wrote:
> > This is an example of trying to err on the side of being overly correct
> for
> > our output. For example, if you input
> >
> > sage: sqrt(2)*5
> >
> > it will get simplified to 5*sqrt
On Thursday 31 May 2007 20:24, Bobby Moretti wrote:
> This is an example of trying to err on the side of being overly correct for
> our output. For example, if you input
>
> sage: sqrt(2)*5
>
> it will get simplified to 5*sqrt(2). But this relies on the behavior of
> maxima's simplification. \sqrt
This is an example of trying to err on the side of being overly correct for
our output. For example, if you input
sage: sqrt(2)*5
it will get simplified to 5*sqrt(2). But this relies on the behavior of
maxima's simplification. \sqrt{2} \cdot 5 is much better than \sqrt{2}5,
which is what could ha
Recently I also encountered this "\cdot". I think it does not
correspond
to usual mathematical typesetting so perhaps it should go.
Michel
On May 31, 5:23 pm, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 11:09, William Stein wrote:
>
> > The file calculus/calculus.py, wh
On Thursday 31 May 2007 11:09, William Stein wrote:
> The file calculus/calculus.py, which is what should be responsible for all
> typesetting of symbolic objects, contains exactly one instance of \\cdot
> (around line 2700). Try removing that and letting us know if the behavior
> is acceptable t
On 5/31/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm giving the new symbolic stuff a bit of a work-out today. I've come across
> two issues.
>
> 1) I'm outputing my results to a latex file and viewing them that way and
> also using the view command. The conversion to latex puts a "\cdot"
