Recently I also encountered this "\cdot". I think it does not correspond to usual mathematical typesetting so perhaps it should go.
Michel On May 31, 5:23 pm, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 31 May 2007 11:09, William Stein wrote: > > > The file calculus/calculus.py, which is what should be responsible for all > > typesetting of symbolic objects, contains exactly one instance of \\cdot > > (around line 2700). Try removing that and letting us know if the behavior > > is acceptable to you; if so maybe we'll just remove it. > > I removed it and it is more to my liking. I suppose that if you used multiple > character variable names, you might like the "\cdot". It would seem to me > that most people won't use multiple character variable names though (and > probably wouldn't convert to latex if they did). I would probably vote to > remove the \cdot, but I'm not entirely convinced one way or the other. > > > It's some bug with either parsing data that is output by Maxima, > > or with how maxima is interpreting something we give it. > > The only way to fix this is for you to post an example. > > Right, I'll try and capture the bug on a more manageable chunk of data. > > -- > Joel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
