Running testsuites has additional dependencies, so using SAGE_CHECK is not
for everybody.
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 1:23:14 AM UTC+1, Buck Evan wrote:
>
> While that got rid of the previous error, there's something else wrong
> here:
>
> I'm going to assume nobody else compiles with SAGE_C
While that got rid of the previous error, there's something else wrong here:
I'm going to assume nobody else compiles with SAGE_CHECK=yes, and I
shouldn't either.
```
Plot 3
Plot 4
Code block begin...end
Plot 5
Code block begin...sys:1: DeprecationWarning: The use of coeffs() is now
deprecated
Notably, avoiding installing the documentation for this package reduces the
download size from 400MB(!) to 9MB.
sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends texlive-latex-extra
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 4:09:54 PM UTC-8, Buck Evan wrote:
>
> This answers my question, although the que
This answers my question, although the question doesn't match the message I
saw.
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/faq/faq-usage.html#when-i-try-to-use-latex-in-the-notebook-it-says-it-cannot-find-fullpage-sty
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 12:49:28 PM UTC-8, Buck Evan wrote:
>
> I'm trying to
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 at 11:27AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> I'm preparing a brief talk on using SageTeX, and discovering that the
> tutorial seems to be incorrect. See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17068
I pushed a fix. Review needed. :)
> Also, this also means that at least some of the informat
Sorry, the title is inaccurate - the documentation IS where it should be,
but the tutorial is wrong. My apologies.
Hi all,
>
> I'm preparing a brief talk on using SageTeX, and discovering that the
> tutorial seems to be incorrect. See
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17068
>
> I'm emailing
I have prepared a ~50 page tutorial on using Sage/SageTeX with TeXShop. It
is a living document and I welcome comments from users about how to
improve. You can download the guide at: http://devio.us/~bannon/sage/
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 4:56:04 PM UTC-4, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
On Jul 16, 2012, at 07:11 , Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> On Jul 16, 7:16 am, kcrisman wrote:
>> Yes! I use SageTeX fairly regularly in precisely this way, and even
>> updating the most recent time was annoying. Basically, one has to upgrade
>> the SageTeX installation every time it changes in S
On Jul 16, 7:16 am, kcrisman wrote:
> Yes! I use SageTeX fairly regularly in precisely this way, and even
> updating the most recent time was annoying. Basically, one has to upgrade
> the SageTeX installation every time it changes in Sage, but this sometimes
> causes weird messages (which I don'
On Jul 12, 2012, at 19:51 , kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:35:56 PM UTC-4, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:58:24 PM UTC-5, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, all,
>>>
>>> I started experimenting with SageTeX, but, having unbridled opti
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:35:56 PM UTC-4, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:58:24 PM UTC-5, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>> Hi, all,
>>
>> I started experimenting with SageTeX, but, having unbridled optimism, I
>> did this with a Beamer template. It turns out that t
On Jul 12, 2012, at 19:35 , John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:58:24 PM UTC-5, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>> I started experimenting with SageTeX, but, having unbridled optimism, I
>> did this with a Beamer template. It turns out that the two don't seem to
>> mix.
>>
>>
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:58:24 PM UTC-5, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I started experimenting with SageTeX, but, having unbridled optimism, I
> did this with a Beamer template. It turns out that the two don't seem to
> mix.
>
> Has anyone had any luck using SageTeX in this wa
On Monday, June 18, 2012 3:17:22 PM UTC-7, Brady wrote:
>
> John,
>
> 1. From q.log:
>
> Package: sagetex 2012/01/16 v2.3.3-69dcb0eb93de embedding Sage into LaTeX
> docum
>
Okay, is it possible that you're running an old version of Sage on this
file? What does "sage -v" tell you?
4. Here i
John,
1. From q.log:
Package: sagetex 2012/01/16 v2.3.3-69dcb0eb93de embedding Sage into LaTeX docum
2. The following search makes me believe there is no other sagetex.sty.
$ kpsewhich sagetex.sty
SAGE_HOME/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex/sagetex.sty
$ locate sagetex.sty
SAGE_HOME/local/s
On Monday, June 18, 2012 1:55:41 PM UTC-7, Brady wrote:
>
> sage-devel,
>
> The SageTeX files released in 5.0.1 seem to be halfway-through a change in
> naming convention. Here is a typical usage in SageTeX with Sage 4.x.
>
> pdflatex q.tex
> sage q.sage
> pdflatex q.tex
> pdflatex
Done
On 16 November 2011 17:38, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:07:15 AM UTC-8, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> 0 jan@muizenberg:/var/autofs/**misc/home/jan$grep example.sage
>> /usr/local/src/sage-4.7.2/**local/share/texmf/tex/generic/**sagetex/example.tex
>>
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:07:15 AM UTC-8, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> 0 jan@muizenberg:/var/autofs/misc/home/jan$grep example.sage
> /usr/local/src/sage-4.7.2/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex/example.tex
> % (pdf)latex example.tex; sage example.sage; pdflatex example.tex
> w
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 at 07:07AM -0700, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 8/3/10 7:52 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> >Yes. I decided that, since people very rarely update their TeX
> >installations, having SageTeX in TeXLive wasn't a good idea. Right now
> >on sage-support I'm helping someone with a very mysterious pr
On 8/3/10 7:52 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 at 07:28AM -0700, Jason Grout wrote:
I just updated my MacTeX installation, and it said sagetex was
"deleted on server". I thought sagetex was included in the TeXLive
distribution (which is I believe what MacTeX is based on); was it
remove
Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 02:21PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
>> Then, I'd say we have a winner!
>>
>> SageTex is going in:
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7617
>
> Just a couple hours before this message about SageTeX being accepted
> into the main Sage distrib
On Dec 7, 9:15 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
> > +1
>
> > BUT I think in that case there should be detailed documentation, in a
> > very easy-to-find place (maybe at the SageTeX home or something),
> > about how one can or cannot use it within the current VirtualBox setup
> > for Wind
>
> [X] Yes!
>
> [ ] No, it should stay an optional spkg for now (it has been one for a
> while)
of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org
I cannot think of a reason this could be bad in any way.
-Marshall
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th
kcrisman wrote:
> +1
>
> BUT I think in that case there should be detailed documentation, in a
> very easy-to-find place (maybe at the SageTeX home or something),
> about how one can or cannot use it within the current VirtualBox setup
> for Windows (I don't know if you can or not, so I will not b
+1
BUT I think in that case there should be detailed documentation, in a
very easy-to-find place (maybe at the SageTeX home or something),
about how one can or cannot use it within the current VirtualBox setup
for Windows (I don't know if you can or not, so I will not be writing
this documentation
MaxTheMouse wrote:
> I install this every time.
Same here.
[X] Yes!
We briefly described the capabilities and showed a short example of what
it could do to a bunch of people that were not very familiar with Sage
this last weekend at the Education Day in Cambridge. One person
remarked, in ef
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 12:40AM -0800, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Where could one see an example of what it can be used for in
> Sage ? :-)
It's not used for anything in Sage, it's used for things in your LaTeX
files. :)
You can download it from http://tug.ctan.org/pkg/sagetex/ and take a
look at the
On Dec 7, 8:03 am, William Stein wrote:
> [ √ ] Yes!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
Where could one see an example of what it can be used for in
Sage ? :-)
Nathann
On Dec 7, 8:49 am, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:03:08PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
>
> > Please vote:
> > [X] Yes!
>
> --
> Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne
On Dec 6, 11:03 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Please vote:
>
> [X] Yes!
Rob
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.
I install this every time.
[ X] Yes!
Adam
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http
31 matches
Mail list logo
